The Sharminator
|
February 2010
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ollie (skateboarding trick) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyZTTS0H0xA, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjjQgZlpuDQ, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyZTTS0H0xA (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Missy Monroe. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Missy Monroe. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Missy Monroe, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Nymf talk/contr. 01:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- The Sharminator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 115.64.47.34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Missy0Monroe". The reason given for Missy0Monroe's block is: " The account you created has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {unblock
- Blocking administrator: Your reason here (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ".|Tabercil|decline=No, if you're operating multiple accounts in violation of WP:SOCK, I don't think an unblock would be appropriate. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)}}
|}
If you want to request unblocking again, that's okay. But please don't put it into the middle of your previous request- that's the edit I fixed, that you undid- and please include a reason that you should be unblocked that addresses your inappropriate use of another account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- I apologise for my actions as I wasn't previously aware of the fact that you are not allowed to have multiple user accounts, I am now and I also admit it was intentionally a "block evasion". I'm not gonna bother doing the whole "unblock" thing because it seems like a waste of time, and I also doubt that I will get unblocked (I just been reading all about this in the "guideline" articles on "SOCK" or Sockpuppeting or whatever...). -- Sharminator (talk) 03:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- ahh what the hell, the block on my ip address keeps resetting (probably indefinite) so I can't make any contributions at all -- Sharminator (talk) 04:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
The Sharminator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was ignorant of the Wikipedia policies and admit it was a deliberate attempt to evade a block (although unintentional, as I was not aware that multiple user accounts are not permitted)
Decline reason:
Whether you didn't know of the socking policy seems somewhat irrelevant; if this was indeed deliberate, why would you be under the impression that evading your block would be acceptable? This also doesn't address your edits, which are also in violation of policy, and it does nothing to convince me that unblocking you would be beneficial. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
and I was right -- Sharminator (talk) 04:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)