The lad searches the night for his newts

The lad searches the night for his newts, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi The lad searches the night for his newts! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

GA review of Calugula (film)

Your lack of experience in Wikipedia and your failure to adhere to GA instructions makes your review inappropriate. Go ahead and revert yourself. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

This is utterly childish. If you have a problem with my listing the article as GA, open a GA review, don't try to whitewash history in a Stalinist fashion because you don't agree with my review. The lad searches the night for his newts (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

You need to assume good faith. We could take the review to GAR, but I'd highly anticipate a broad consensus to delist on the grounds that the review was insubstantial. So it is far easier to ignore that rule for the good of the project and just re-run the review again. I have left comments where I believe the article could be fixed, and invite people to act upon them, provided they have the relevant sources. At the end of the day, the most important point is : Are we improving the article? That's it. Snapping at people who have a higher perception of article quality than you will win you no friends. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

issue on another article

Hi,

I nominated an article for GA status and a reviewer began to work on it. However the reviewer ran into some kind of issue where they had to stop being a reviewer - some topic they were not allowed to handle I think. They asked for another reviewer to take over but I have no idea how to do that. If you have any suggestion I'd welcome it - see Talk:Nipo T. Strongheart/GA1. --Smkolins (talk) 10:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

hoping this is resolved - posted to the GA help section… --Smkolins (talk) 01:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armageddon (underground comic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Caligula (film)

Hello. I noticed you are re-reviewing Caligula at GAN after it failed. It is, however, not how it works since it wasn't placed back on GAN. If you have a problem with it failing its GAN, you should instead take it to WP:GAR and notify User:Ritchie333 about this. GamerPro64 02:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Have you thought about taking this up to an admin or going to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents about it? Or even the GAN talk page? GamerPro64 05:29, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)