Thebluenun
|
Nick Adenhart
editThanks for the work you have been putting into the article. Nice work. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Greg Giraldo
editThe Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
For your efforts on the Greg Giraldo article, and for having good taste in comedy |
Reply
editI'm sorry you feel that way, but bold edits are actually encouraged here. It's irrelevant who the copyright holder is, I'm sure the works are still copyrighted, and thus are not to be included as sources here. Additionally, none of the episode links you included appear to come from 'official' channels of any company and all appear to be just random individuals (definitely a copyright violation). Please see WP:COPYLINK: "Images, video and sound files on the internet need to be licensed directly from the copyright holder or someone able to license on their behalf." Perhaps you have a source indicating that these posters are authorized to license this work? DP76764 (Talk) 00:56, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- Please refrain from name calling. To answer your question: the part that I have previously cited to you (above): "Images, video and sound files on the internet need to be licensed directly from the copyright holder or someone able to license on their behalf.". The burden lies on you to provide proof that the accounts publishing those video clips are legally allowed to do so (they appear to be anonymous individuals which would not be legal). Further re-addition of those links will be considered vandalism and you may be reported or blocked for spamming or edit warring. Finally, just FYI, you do not need to sign edit summaries with ~~~~; that signature is only used on talk pages. DP76764 (Talk) 21:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
December 2012
editHello, I'm Hwy43. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cold Lake, Alberta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hwy43 (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Todd Lynn, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages HOT 97 and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Thebluenun. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Tyler Henry
editThis is a warning: If you continue to make the sort of edits you recently made to the Tyler Henry article [1] - deleting an entire section and then providing a bogus reason (Cleanup) in order to hide this fact and actually push your POV, your account will be blocked. And if I notice it I will be the first to initiate the action. RobP (talk) 18:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Thebluenun. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editThe article Jean Warr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No signs of sufficient notability per WP:NAUTHOR and/or WP:BIO found
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Jean Warr, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Warr (April 19)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jean Warr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jean Warr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Thebluenun!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiAviator talk 08:09, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
|