Thefenestrator
Joined 13 September 2024
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Ybsone in topic September 2024
September 2024
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Greens (Poland). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your opinon/observation: "Jachira's entry to the party" is not a reliable source for Wikipedia YBSOne (talk) 14:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ybsone Unconstructive edits? I'm Polish and I've been actively interested in Polish politics 10 years, so I know what I'm doing. Thefenestrator (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Read WP:RS and point me to the section "trust me bro I know what I'm doing". Do not remove sourced content without backing new content with reliable sources, instead of your personal opinions. YBSOne (talk) 15:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ybsone I didn't know outdated sources are reliable, it's something new to me! Thefenestrator (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- outdated by whos standards? sources that are there for years unchallenged are more reliable than editor's personal opinions.
A user with 21 edits. Account created on 13 September 2024.
Isn't editng Wikipedia new to you altogether? Please read WP:RS and WP:OR before making such drastic edits and challenge every source if you must on the talk page to gain consensus, when experienced editors point it out for you. YBSOne (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)- @Ybsone Articles from 2007 are indeed outdated. And no, Wikipedia is not new for me, I returned after 6 years break. Thank you for your ad personam, it's proof that you don't even know, what's going on in the Sejm :) Have a nice day and be more kind to others. Thefenestrator (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Could you show your last account? Was there anything wrong with it that you're using a new one? YBSOne (talk) 08:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ybsone Articles from 2007 are indeed outdated. And no, Wikipedia is not new for me, I returned after 6 years break. Thank you for your ad personam, it's proof that you don't even know, what's going on in the Sejm :) Have a nice day and be more kind to others. Thefenestrator (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- outdated by whos standards? sources that are there for years unchallenged are more reliable than editor's personal opinions.
- @Ybsone I didn't know outdated sources are reliable, it's something new to me! Thefenestrator (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Read WP:RS and point me to the section "trust me bro I know what I'm doing". Do not remove sourced content without backing new content with reliable sources, instead of your personal opinions. YBSOne (talk) 15:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)