User talk:Thehelpfulone/Archive/June 2012

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Mlpearc in topic OS Run
User:Thehelpfulone User talk:Thehelpfulone User:Thehelpfulone/Awards User:Thehelpfulone/Sandbox Special:EmailUser/Thehelpfulone User:Thehelpfulone/Guestbook
User page Talk page Awards Sandbox Email me Guestbook


Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For repeatedly smacking down the 4chan vandals ScottSteiner 11:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re:Test Wiki

Could you please come back to the test Wiki and grant my account, The Illusive Man, 'crat access to the tools? Much obliged, thank you. The Illusive Man(Contact) 23:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

Hi - Please see - Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Pending_Changes_RFC_closure_delay_for_over_two_weeks - Its closed now, so a bit late to notify but i didn't know the identity of the other closers - thanks - Youreallycan 19:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

Mausoleum at Halicarnassus

Hi there. Just noticed this edit; there's probably not an easy way for the bot to tell that the previous edit was category-damaging vandalism, but I just thought I'd give you a heads-up anyway. 28bytes (talk) 02:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have reported[1] this issue before, with the suggestion that Helpful bot could back-off for a little while after IP edits to allow another editor to fix the vandalism before Helpful bot dives in with a sledgehammer. —Sladen (talk) 10:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hey guys, sorry for the delay in responding. I'll ask the developers of pywikipedia if such a delay can be implemented, the script that adds the interwiki links is looking at the RC feed to add edits, maybe I can tell it to ignore pages if the last edit was by an IP. The Helpful One 12:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
(Bump.) I think ignoring last edits from IPs would be a good solution, since I think virtually all problematic cases have involved IP vandalism. A fixed delay could still fail if the vandalism wasn't caught in that time. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:55, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cto

 Template:Cto has been nominated for deletion. Template:Cto creates a conditional topic overview linkbox for the See also section of an article with links to (1) the topic article, (2) the outline of the topic, (3) the index of topic-related articles, (4) the bibliography of the topic, and (5) the Wikipedia book on the topic. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Cto. Yours aye,  Buaidh  19:56, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

You received this because you are a member of WikiProject Outlines. Yours aye,  Buaidh  20:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your bot does something not quite right

Hi, I have run into two cases where your 'Thehelpfulbot' adds a {reflist}. However, in both cases the earlier edit was vandalism where the reference thing was removed, see: [2] and [3]. I am not going to fix possible other cases where your bot "fixed" something following vandalism. Just to let you know there is a problem. Regards. --VanBurenen (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

  The Technical Barnstar
Wow, your bot has helped me by correcting a {reflist} that I misspelled which would have been looked like something totally wrong if left uncorrected especially when the article COULD be "PRODed" if the information where to show up incorrect. Thank you. James3167 (talk) 03:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

No rush

WT:Pending_changes/Request_for_Comment_2012#Moving forward and WT:Pending_changes/Request_for_Comment_2012#The next closers. - Dank (push to talk) 20:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

Thank you, Thehelpfulbot, for adding the missing reflist on Elsie's page for me :-) Darla Darlaspek (talk) 05:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

OS Run

I would like to thank everyone for your questions and comments. If appointed I will strive to do the best job possible for the community and the project I will also keep in mind that according to this log I will be the only non-admin in the group and the best I could hope for is to pave a strong smooth path for future non-admins, again I appreciate your interest, concerns and support. Mlpearc (powwow) 14:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply