User talk:Thehelpfulone/Archive/March 2008

User page	Talk page	Awards	Sandbox	Email me	Guestbook

Looking at your contributions...

That's a ton of barnstars. Why? (not that I have a problem with it) Malinaccier (talk) 22:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar! And same to you! ;) Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 22:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar, but what was it for?  Sunderland06  00:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

As above. Thank you THO. Glad to help. Rudget. 09:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome template

Can you point me to the welcome template so I can do it myself next time?

Thanks! M1rth (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again for the help, much appreciated. M1rth (talk) 19:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:AN notice about accounts-enwiki-l

Umm, are you sure about that?? from my reading of your notice, you seem to be implying that unblock-en-l has been superceded. I haven't been following all the discussion on accounts-enwiki-l (in fact I just unsubscribed), but as far as I know, that was never intended to take traffic away from unblock-en-l. I have to go now, so I'll leave you to it, but if you aren't quite sure about that, you might just remove the notice on AN. If you are sure and I just msised something.... well, nevermind. --barneca (talk) 21:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Removed notice that is confusing. --The Helpful One ^(Review) 21:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi THO. OK, thanks, I thought that might have been a bit of an over-reach. FYI, I unsubscribed from the list because I won't have much time to deal with requests for a while, the mailing list email was filling my inbox, and it seems there are numerous admins to help with the workload. If it ever seems to you like more admin attention to the list is needed, drop me an email and I'll re-subscribe. --barneca (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah OK! I have about 400 emails in my Inbox from the mailing list, so it is a bit hectic! --The Helpful One ^(Review) 21:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

help with image removal

I posted a help message because I was practicing with adding images in what I thought was the sandbox, but apparently not as it seems to be out there on Wikipedia somewhere. I tried to get rid of it and inadvertently may have deleted indications that this was my photo and a such is not a copyright issue. I received a stern warning to validate the ownership or whatever. I only want to delete the image from Wikipedia! Cannot figure out how to do this - I am quite inexperienced obviously and do not yet understand all the lingo and procedures. Any help you can provide? Fosterbe (talk) 15:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care of this for me!Fosterbe (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Do Not Understand This MSG

[edit] December 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.

The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User:K2wh, you will be blocked from editing. Other people's user pages. Happy New Year! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) 13:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Why did I receive this msg?

Thanks, Bill K2WH

Ned's Declassified

Why are you undoing my edits. I played two parts on Ned's - Mr. Combover and Mr. Gross - and I would like the page to be fair and honest. Steve Bannos

reverted link on NIV Study Bible

I unreverted your change. The link was a 404, and I provided the correct one. Why didn't you check before reverting me? Ἀλήθεια (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Katara

Hi,

I am trying to make a change to Katara's page. It is accurate and details her story on the show "Avatar, the last Airbender." The changes I made were tagged as vandalism; why is this? Can you be of assistance, thanks,

Mike

Steve Bannos

Could you PLEASE tell the other watch dog on Wiki that I am not vandalizing!! I am trying to update my mentions. Steve Bannos

'Crat

Sure! Icestorm815 • Talk 21:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfB

I wanted to personally thank you, TH1, for your support in my recent RfB. I am thankful and appreciative that you feel that I am worthy of the trust the community requires of its bureaucrats, and I hope to continue to behave in a way that maintains your trust in me and my actions. I have heard the community's voice that they require more of a presence at RfA's of prospective bureaucrats, and I will do my best over the near future to demonstrate such a presence and allow the community to see my philosophy and practices in action. I hope I can continue to count on your support when I decide to once again undergo an RfB. If you have any suggestions, comments, or constructive criticisms, please let me know via talkpage or e-mail. Thank you again. -- Avi (talk) 16:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Userpage

WRONG! CTRL+A helps... microchip08 (talk) 13:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Well done. You did it. Congratulations. You found my secret page. Feel free to give yourself a pat on the back, unless you didn't actually go through my links... and did it another way, in which case you may add yourself to the cheat list. Have you found all my "red herrings"? Yours, microchip08 (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Miessence Product Range.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Miessence Product Range.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

What?

I wasn't talking to Jimbo Wales, I was talking to someone who left something along the lines of omg omg you founded wikipedia yay!. Please take more care in the future. Joshuarooney2008 (talk) 19:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, please refrain from making any contact with me in the future. Joshuarooney2008 (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I hear you're really helpful, so...

...I'm requesting a temporary admin coach as my full-time one is on break. The main areas I need help in are MYSPACEing and doing the correct amount of research before acting. Please? --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 20:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, you should be. I've listed my name, but they keep turning me down. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 22:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

FYI

User talk:80.58.205.33. I got it checkusered beforehand, and it looks legit. Cheers! ;) -- lucasbfr ^talk 23:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Reverting

Hi Thehelpfulone! Please always check the version you're reverting to. [1] Thanks! ➨ REDVEЯS is a satellite and will be set alight 20:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Nearly deleted me?

But why =( ShieldDane (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll sense you non! ShieldDane (talk) 19:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Well I am glad you saw it in your heart not to. ShieldDane (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh hey, some one said they were checkuserng me (oddly enough some folks think i'm a sock puppet) I was wondering what that actually means and is there anywhere i can view the progress on it? ShieldDane (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for reverting back the Gregg v. Georgia article. Much love! 149.4.115.3 (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Usernames

It's fine - it's very subjective, and believe me, I used to have reports to WP:UAA refused. If I may, let me offer you a piece of advice. Bear in mind that the whole point of WP:UAA is for usernames which require immediate admin intervention. Really really really confusing usernames would count (but QWERTYcucumber, which isn't really random or confusing, wouldn't). In a number of instances, these things can be resolved by taking them up with the user concerned, particularly where they've made no edits, or their edits have been good-faith. Thanks! _GB^T/C 21:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

why would you prevent the documentary link on Zeitgeist, it is more than relevant to the subject. Let me know what's on you mind. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.96.181.42 (talk) 16:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

for the voicing. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 18:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Rapidshare

Why were both attempts to edit the Rapidshare wikipedia page reverted for so-called vandalism? The thing we edited out is blatantly wrong, ISP's are not always providing bandwith if the site is not blocked, but only to users who happen to be using the site. ISP's mainly block this site to avoid legal issues dealing with piracy. They do not block it because they are somehow always providing bandwith to the site 24/7. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farseerfool (talk • contribs)

Reverting

Hi Thehelpfulone! Please check this page. The "FIFA player of the century" is full of lies and passioned not neutral positions. So to prove whow is the fifa player of the century check the follow official sites. http://www.iffhs.de/?42d03e32a16f43809fa3c17c13c09e20a15ff3c09f32b17f7370eff3702bb1c2bbb6e28fc380de43110f83d00e09

http://www.iffhs.de

Wikipedia is the only on line encyclopedia that supports that Maradona is the winner of that award. He received a "internet version of the award". That is the FIFA version. Pele received the real stuff. Now people can said anything they want even that Elvis is not dead. But that page is fake. Keeping false information brings bad reputation to Wikipedia. Im done with this editing fight. Wiki loses maradona fans won. Bye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.98.100.243 (talk • contribs)

Fixed above request. The Helpful One ^(Review) 19:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Surely, if what you're saying passes WP:V, it'll have multiple reliable sources saying so (news reports, etc). We go by what's verifiable. That's how it works here. SQL^{Query me!} 19:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Evlis

Thehelpfulone, To be fair, I did actually try to delete the article, but I thought that if you deleted the content, it deleted the article, I am sincerely sorry about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BenjaminTeague123456 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Fake New Message

I recently put a fake New Message box on my page and just yesterday a user named DiligentTerrier removed it from my page without telling me and leaving the edit summary as "removed fake new message box as per wikipedia policy" I was wondering if this is really against wiki policy Smart Guy ^{(talk) (Sign)} 14:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

hi

hi

you just messaged me about 'disruptive edits', i'm new to actually editing (I normally just read)

I don't want to annoy people (or get banned) so how can I make it so I'm not disruptive but able to talk to people?

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.74.78.238 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 19 Mar 2008

Thanks

Thanks very much for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, much appreciated! :) —— Ryan ^(t)•(c) 22:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

My help request

Hi, you recently nullified a help request on my talk page with the edit summary "seems to be fixed?" It wasn't - if you get a chance I'd appreciate a second look.--Opark 77 (talk) 22:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal Case - Wrongly closed

Hi, you closed the case Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-19 National Federation of Republican Assemblies and wondered why. There is a discussion that is getting rancorous going on about edits which needs assistance to sort out. Although the original requester mentioned vandalism we have to assume that the IP editor 63.3.5.2 is acting in good faith. Can I ask you to reopen the case as I don't know how to do that. --Deadly∀ssassin^(talk) 06:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

• Cool - thanks for that --Deadly∀ssassin^(talk) 11:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Wait, they made me an admin?

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which I'm very glad to say was successful at 81/7/0. Some of the very best that Wikipedia has to offer came out to support or oppose me and the kind words from all the editors has really given me confidence to be an admin and I can't wait to start. I will take the advice of the opposes and not jump into any content disputes immediately. As well, I will try to add more content myself. Anyways, in thanks for participating in my RfA, I got you something great but I can't show you because it's fair-use only. Excuse me, I mean non-free. Enjoy! --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 14:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I actually am here. Mm40 what do you want? Your Hancock please 20:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Danke

Well, thanks a lot for helping me with my user page. You really are helpful.

Steve Crossin (talk to me) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Please help me

Following your edits to the Death Proof article today, I am continuing to butt heads --majorly-- with the editor known as Tool2Die4. He is playing bully-boy, and borderline threatening me, and using my obvious unfamiliarity with Wiki against me, despite the several improprieties on his part that I have pointed out.

I don't know what to do or how to resolve the matter (petty as it is). Any suggestions?

I forgot to sign. Sorry. [email protected] (talk) 21:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 3/24/08

Thanks

StaticGull  Talk  has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Edits to Derby County history

I fail to see how my changes to the clubs history are unconstructive. The section previously read along the lines of 'and then they signed Earnshaw, and then they signed Davies, and then they...' as people have updated it without trying to structure the sentences properly. I updated it to make it a paragrpah rather than a group of sentences cobbled together. AnOrdinaryBoy (talk) 15:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

No problems mate, hope I didn't sound snappy in my original message I didn't mean to be just thought it was a confusing revert ;-) AnOrdinaryBoy (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Snowolf user page

FYI, re this: you don't want to remove "px" everywhere. Only remove it from templates where it's causing a repeat, i.e., height=200px but then the template uses {{{height}}}px, so you get an image whose height is set to "200pxpx". See T15500. The correct fix for that page is just this. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 17:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Special Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar, TheHelpfulOne, for a quick and well made response to my helpme notice. JaakobouChalk Talk 19:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Irrefutable proof

I do not think it's vandalism. I guess I just need to Wikify it or something. Irrefutable proof must be spread. --68.218.148.230 (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Your AWB edits

Hey. Please do not use AWB to convert articles' interwiki sorting order the way you did here, here and apparently in hundreds of more edits. Your edits have made the sorting order inconsistent with the very large majority of our articles (see Wikipedia:IL#Sorting). Your edit summaries, "Typo fixing", are also inaccurate. Prolog (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks (about my signature and my other question)

thanks for noticing the mistake in my signature

also I think you're probably right about the fake "new message" box it probably is pretty annoying —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reallysmartgrammarwiz (talk • contribs) 14:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Please review your reversion of my edits

You recently reverted my edits to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon,

1. If you will review my edits you will see that the reference DOES NOT go to the supreme court decision but is in fact a link to the respondants brief to the court, I do not see how correcting this error is unconstructive

2. I have been unable to find the decision in the case, I do not believe it has been released see: http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=US_v._Williams#Opinion_Analysis If you have any evidence to the contrary, other than the mislabeled link, please correct the article to reflect that, barring that, I do not see how removing what appears to be a misleading claim is unconstructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.88.131 (talk) 22:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me

I guess you are living up to your user name. I appreciate it and i can understand why vandals would not like you. I hate them so much that it pains me that users like you and so many others have to be cleaning up vandalism everyday instead of making wikipedia better if you know what i mean like editing articles making them better etc. I know you can protect pages, block IP addresses but even this will not stop the vandals. Its sad they're always going to be there. Its sort of like grafitti in the public, you can clean it up but tomorrow it'll probably be back up there. What can you do? I dont know but that i guess is one of the downsides to having wikipedia 'anyone can edit' Thanks again and all the best, i thought that the 'best' wikipedians would be the ones who have made the most edits, i try and ask them qs but you are the one for me. Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

PS that was lightning fast. By the way you have only been on for 4 months, i thought it was more i remember always seeing someone like you wanting to help everyone. You mean the username 'thehelpfulone' wasn't taken 4 months ago? You certainly have learnt a lot in just 4 months, you sound like someone who has been there from the start so to speak. Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 12:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

New Tzatziki Squad collaboration!

Hello! I'm here to inform you that the Tzatziki Squad has begun a new collaboration, history of timekeeping devices. The goal for the article is Featured status. Please pitch in as much or as little as you can, we appreciate your help! Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the recent edits by 163.153.96.101 The district has reported that they have identified the students involved, and are taking appropriate action. --NERIC-Security (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

I can has mop?

Hi Thehelpfulone/Archive/March 2008! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3). I truely appreciate the many votes of confidence, and I will exert myself to live up to those expectations. Thanks again! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)