Welcome!

Hello, Theirishpianist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --rogerd 16:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rocky Balboa

edit

I implore you to trim that plot down as per Wikipedia's policy on plot summaries. Please remove irrelevant content that doesn't discuss the main point of the film. I've only looked at the first paragraph, but could have removed several items from there. I'd do this myself, but, not having seen the film I'd rather not ruin it. Bignole 21:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I can only glance at the size to see it, since I don't want to ruin the film. Once I see it, I'll give the plot a once over to see what's what (i.e. what might be able to be worded better, or condensed). Thanks for trimming it though. Bignole 00:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

F3 Euroseries GA review

edit

Thanks for the compliment; I'm glad you like it. I have left a query for you regarding improvement on the article's talk page. Regards, Adrian M. H. 17:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I have done some work on it, adding sources and trimming where necessary. Regards, Adrian M. H. 23:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hello. How's the review going? Adrian M. H. 18:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much for taking the time to do the review! Regards, Adrian M. H. 16:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

VP

edit

Of course it is up to the moderators to decide the fate of your application, but they likely will reject it, because you have done only 222 mainspace edits, and the required minimum is 250 ;-). Bye and Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk) on 23:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your VandalProof Application

edit

Dear Theirishpianist,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you only have 227 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.

Assistance please

edit
 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Theirishpianist~enwiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
theirishpianist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: Please follow the instructions. We need the original block message and blocking admin in order to find your block. -- Yamla 21:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theirishpianist~enwiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

This IP address has been blocked temporarily.CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address is being used abusively;the address has been blocked to prevent further abuse. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GAC backlog elimination drive

edit

This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --Nehrams2020 00:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 2007 GAC backlog elimination drive

edit

A new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.

You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. --Nehrams2020 03:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assistance

edit
 Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 64.241.37.140 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

--jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football December 2007 Newsletter

edit

The December 2007 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football January 2008 Newsletter

edit

The January 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football February 2008 Newsletter

edit

The February 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football March 2008 Newsletter

edit

The March 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football April 2008 Newsletter

edit

The April 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:Current movie figures

edit

Template:Current movie figures has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.
As the creator of the template, I thought you should know. -- Yellowdesk (talk) 00:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football May 2008 Newsletter

edit

The May 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football June 2008 Newsletter

edit

The June 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football July 2008 Newsletter

edit

The July 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football August 2008 Newsletter

edit

The August 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football September 2008 Newsletter

edit

The September 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football October 2008 Newsletter

edit

The October 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football December 2008 Newsletter

edit

The December 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football January 2009 Newsletter

edit

The January 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football February 2009 Newsletter

edit

The February 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Sweeps invitation

edit

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are listed as a GA reviewer. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 07:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

03:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

19:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Rocky Balboa (film)

edit

Rocky Balboa (film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply