User talk:Themap55/sandbox
Latest comment: 6 years ago by GRivia in topic Peer Review
feedback for the fire class
edit- Go ahead and add your simple edits to the club sports articles. And start the "talk" page for larger changes you are not prepared to make, but think they should be made.
- For the Firestorm article: yes there is some overlap with firebombing but the firestorm article does seem to have focus on the conditions that lead to fire-generated winds. For woodland fire...this extreme fire behavior is very hard to understand and model. I think this would be a challenging article to add significant material. I am not sure if that is your plan.
- Please let me know your ideas for the main article for the class. Thanks,
Response
edit- I do plan on adding a section talking about pyrocumulus and pyrocumulumbus with material from three articles i sourced through the U of O library. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themap55 (talk • contribs) 05:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review
edit- It is an interesting topic and you really spent a lot of time on it. Personally the current content looks as good as a mature article.
- What are your subtopics? Currently I saw Mechanism, Firebombing and Potential Firestorms. But I think that Firebombing is not as important as Mechanism. My suggestion is (personally), changing the subtopics into Mechanism, Formation, Climatology, Life cycle etc. These subtopics will make your writing easier.
- The last part of your article seems still under construction. But I think that it is not a big deal.
- If you can find more pictures about firestorms, it will be awesome.