Theremes

hi world!

Talk section regarding your edits to Avatar (2009 film)

You can discuss it for consensus here.

Edit war at Avatar (2009 film)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Bob K31416 (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 55 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Absurd additions

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page 9/11 conspiracy theories worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Your 3 additions are either sourced to a blog, unsourced, or unrelated to the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

9/11 conspiracy theories

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 9/11 conspiracy theories. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. TFD (talk) 16:30, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I have requested input at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Theremes reported by User:2over0 (Result: ) regarding your involvement in an edit war at 9/11 conspiracy theories. - 2/0 (cont.) 17:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at 9/11 conspiracy theories. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. CIreland (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Additionally....

Notification of existence of Discretionary sanctions relating to 9/11

Please review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/September_11_conspiracy_theories#Discretionary_sanctions.

CIreland (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)