Thesixserra
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Atkmb
edithttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:ATK_Mohun_Bagan_FC
See my comment and fix details 93.137.72.20 (talk) 12:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
April 2023
edit
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Soraisham Sandeep Singh. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 19:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Yair Urbina
edit@Thesixserra:, Please withdraw and close the disucission Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesús Urbina since if you search up Yair Urbina (the name he goes by) portero (Spanish for goalie) on Google, you get a lot of Spanish results and the fact that there is a immediate clear consensus to keep already. Has made 143+ appearances in the fully pro Liga MX and Ascenso MX. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 13:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm happy to withdraw the nom if some of concerns got cleared. I doubt whether the player is meeting GNG criteria. Has he got any significant coverage from those spanish sources? Thesixserra (talk) 03:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- I missed something there - what the other 2 sources other than Google? Nfitz (talk) 04:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.