Thetehror

File copyright problem with File:Oldhouseweb.GIF

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Oldhouseweb.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Your addition to Cast iron has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. http://www.oldhouseweb.com/how-to-advice/the-maintenance-and-repair-of-architectural-cast-iron.shtml Wizard191 (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Your addition to higher education has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Your addition to executive education has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Quinstreet, World wide learn, and related articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

February 2010

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --John (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, please stop the spamming! I found your edits at an article I am following, and then saw your 'contributions' to a great number of other articles. It appears you have nothing useful to contribute, but are using Wikipedia as a free form of advertising a website that I assume you are affiliated with. This is cheap and sleazy, undermines Wikipedia, and can only cast the integrity of your website in doubt. Taquito1 (talk) 04:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Worldwidelearn.png

Thank you for uploading File:Worldwidelearn.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, OldHouseWeb, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "OldHouseWeb" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

24 March 2015.

The definition applied to the Batter board article has been taken word for word from the oldhouseweb website. The article has been tagged as such. Do you have permission to use their definition? Wordreader (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of World wide learn

The article World wide learn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 06:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Worldwidelearn.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Worldwidelearn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of OldHouseWeb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OldHouseWeb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OldHouseWeb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 19:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oldhouseweb.GIF

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oldhouseweb.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)