User talk:Thincat/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

DYK for Geoffrey Bruce (mountaineer)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your oppose of Sarek

I don't understand it. There's no limit on the numbers of admins. If his RfA succeeds, it doesn't stop others coming forwards. But unsuccessful RfAs are likely to make people think twice about running. P.S. please excuse this gentle badgering.--Dweller (talk) 09:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I rarely vote at RFA and I thought a lot about this before opposing. I think most (nearly all?) editors would make perfectly good admins if they were willing to stand and were interested in doing at least one aspect of the work. The problem is we don't know in advance who won't be good (which is why I don't vote normally). And we usually can't throw out the bad apples even when a lot of people think they are bad. See how long the recent case took (years) to get resolved and I can immediately think of three other unresolved cases (though I've been around a long time). In the present situation I think an awful thing was done, far worse than most people would do and I'm rather disappointed that so many people seem not to mind too much. Of course people can improve but other people don't need to reform. I think an editor picked at random would probably not be so abusive. I tried hard not to be unpleasant in what I said but an oppose is inevitably not complimentary. Thincat (talk) 13:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Ah, I wouldn't have commented on an uncomplimentary oppose (in fact, I haven't) just one that didn't appear to make any sense. What you've written above is completely different from what you wrote at the RfA. Were you just trying to be gentle? If so, don't be because a) the candidate can clearly cope with it and b) from experience, I can say that the closing bureaucrat needs to know how to weigh your !vote, and if you've misrepresented your opinion that's not good. Anyway, thanks for replying. --Dweller (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I wondered whether you had misunderstood and, since I now realise that you did, obviously other people will have done likewise. Yes, I was trying to be gentle and I must have tried too hard (or not very well!). I'll consider changing my rationale but I'll probably end up leaving it. BTW I didn't mind you asking at all and it didn't come across as badgering in the slightest. Thincat (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for admin?

Oh, and have you ever considered turning this redlink, blue? --Dweller (talk) 14:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Years ago, when reaching 2000 edits meant you were rather likely to be asked, I deliberately reduced my editing to avoid it! So, I suppose the answer is "yes" and, again, "no"! Thincat (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I've not done a thorough trawl through your murky back history of diffs, but your willingness to discuss and avoid conflict bode well. If I think you'd make a good candidate, would you accept a nomination? --Dweller (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

No, not thorough enough to spot my vandalism ([1]). There really isn't any aspect of admin work that appeals to me and I don't feel any strong sense of duty either. So no, but thank you. Thincat (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

LOL! --Dweller (talk) 15:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Award

	The anti-badger award
	The anti-badger award is hereby made to User:Thincat for being gentle on RfA candidates and badgers alike. Dweller (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (1935 British Mount Everest reconnaissance expedition) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1935 British Mount Everest reconnaissance expedition, Thincat!

Wikipedia editor Lakun.patra just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great Work

To reply, leave a comment on Lakun.patra's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A pie for you! Awesome work!

Thank you for your contributions at Coxs Corner, Monmouth County, New Jersey. Tinton5 (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Affair of the Dancing Lamas

Harrias ^talk 19:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

COI disclosures

I thought you might be interested in this discussion, because we talked about it quite extensively at some point in the past and it was an interesting conversation. CorporateM (Talk) 20:34, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Article for Deletion/Keeping

Hey hope you are doing well. There is a page you have contributed to that is being considered for deletion: List of Christian Nobel laureates. You are welcome to put in any input on the issues by going to the page and clicking on the link for that article. Jobas (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Order of the Netherlands Lion and subcategories relisted

Hello. You participated in either the CFD discussion to delete the above category and its subcategories or the DRV discussion regarding those categories (or both). The result of the DRV was to relist the categories for discussion. This is a notification that they have now been relisted for discussion here. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 23:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Second RM for Southern Apls

You took part in an RM "Southern Alps#Requested move 29 November 2015" which I closed with a "Technical close" and a move the page back to the original name under WP:RMUM,but suggesting that another RM could be started immediately. A new RM was opened one day later Southern Alps#Requested move 30 November 2015, proposing that the page is moved from Southern Alps → Southern Alps (New Zealand) with Southern Alps becoming a dab page. Your are receiving this mass message because you expressed an opinion in the first RM request and AFAICT have not done so in the second. -- Sent by PBS using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Debate on the Hadith

articles like this: Debate on the Hadith, are the main reason i still bother to donate my money to wikipedia. YdhaW has done an excellent job compiling these critically important areas within islamic schools of thought and teaching- into a single coherent article. considering the article was very recently created it will undoubtedly need refinement over the weeks and months to come, specifically the opening statements of the article, and the section "whats next?", should be rephrased to fall more inline with the encyclopedic standards wikipedia seeks to maintain. thank you Thincat for restoring the article and bringing attention to it here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Criticism_of_Hadith#Debate_on_the_Hadith, - The5thForce (talk) 15:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind message. As I've said I don't know anything about the subject but I hope something worthwhile can be achieved here. Unfortunately, I will not be able to contribute to the article in any informed way. Thincat (talk) 17:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Cairngorm Plateau Disaster

On 26 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cairngorm Plateau Disaster, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that five schoolchildren and their leader's assistant died in a blizzard in the 1971 Cairngorm Plateau Disaster when they failed to reach the Curran shelter in the Scottish Highlands? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cairngorm Plateau Disaster. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cairngorm Plateau Disaster), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Thincat. You have new messages at David J Johnson's talk page.
Message added 10:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The talk page discussion I started. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Black Canyon High School

Regarding Black Canyon High School, Thanks for catching my error of using WP:NOTYET. What I actually meant was WP:TOOSOON. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freedom Charity logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freedom Charity logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Thincat, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thincat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thincat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

FYI: help desk canned answers

Judging by [2], you are not aware of {{HD}}. Those prove useful. Cheers! Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 10:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I was not aware of the template (but for communication I never use templates anyway). I expect there is a template for saying what I have just said! Thincat (talk) 12:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories

This is a notice that a discussion you participated in, either at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 February 8 has resulted in a Request for comment at Wikipedia talk:User categories#Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stpaulsblitz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stpaulsblitz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

AFD

Thank you for reminding and making me think better about the AFD in question, I have now presented the valid reasons for deletion. Capitals00 (talk) 08:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I don't have any knowledge of what sources have to say on the matter so I will not be taking part in any discussion. I suspect it is a matter of editorial judgement how things should be handled. Thincat (talk) 09:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for List of Mountain Bothies Association bothies

On 23 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of Mountain Bothies Association bothies, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that you can stay overnight free of charge in any of over ninety bothies (Corrour Bothy pictured), but you must bring your own fuel if you want to watch "bothy TV"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of Mountain Bothies Association bothies. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of Mountain Bothies Association bothies), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Very nice!

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Wanted to give you this for that amazing work on List of Mountain Bothies Association bothies. That's a real public service—and it's a treat to read about something you had no idea existed. Veggies (talk) 19:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. It was a lot of work but it drove home to me how Geoff Allan for his book must have done a hundred times more work. I did know that bothies existed but I've never been in one and on the two occasions I've been at a place where one is I didn't realise there was a bothy there at all! Thincat (talk) 19:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Amazing job on List of Mountain Bothies Association bothies! You took a subject that few people have ever heard of and gave it the full FA treatment. The DYK hook was also fantastic! Since I was the one who promoted it to the image slot, I thought it might show a conflict of interest to give you a barnstar for it on the spot, so I waited until after it appeared on the main page. Guess what? 37,379 readers agree with me! Keep up the great work! Yoninah (talk) 09:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@Yoninah: Thank you for your message. I was pleased it had gone to the image slot, it was a very good photo for Geograph. As for the hook, at least two people complained about it (not the usual suspects) and seemingly administrative action was required while it was on the main page![3][4] The article got a lot of hits and I'll see about that when I have time. Thincat (talk) 17:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas Abernethy (explorer)

On 11 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Abernethy (explorer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1831 Thomas Abernethy was in James Clark Ross's party—the first to reach the North Magnetic Pole? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Abernethy (explorer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Abernethy (explorer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Geoffrey Bruce & George Finch, 1922.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Geoffrey Bruce & George Finch, 1922.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Oxygen equipment on 1922 Everest expedition.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oxygen equipment on 1922 Everest expedition.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:1922 Mount Everest expedition, second climbing party descending.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1922 Mount Everest expedition, second climbing party descending.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:1922 Everest expedition at Base Camp.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1922 Everest expedition at Base Camp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:General Charles Granville Bruce.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:General Charles Granville Bruce.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:John Noel with filming equipment, 1922.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Noel with filming equipment, 1922.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Apologies; I had never heard of that little factoid before. I've withdrawn the FfDs. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I've replied on your talk page. Thincat (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Roger, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh666 22:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

List of caves of Maryland

Hello. I'm not sure what your logic is behind the revert for deletion. Care to elaborate? That talk page is almost 99% me, so are you saying I'm at odds with myself? The only person to reply to me was from a fellow who doesn't frequent the article but was strolling by. As for the discussion itself, nothing of consequence was said, which is why I'll start stripping the article of uncited info shortly. What is left may be eligible for deletion again through AfD as almost none of the remaining material will pertain to the subject matter in any meaningful or notable way. Also, something being controversial doesn't mean that the proposal is without merit. I've laid out several valid policy reasons why this article shouldn't exist at all.

However, if you want to have a discussion, I recommend doing so beforehand and not after I start deleting stuff. I've already given a few pointers. Leitmotiv (talk) 17:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

I have given my rationale on the talk page but I suspect your comment here was started before I saved it. I don't particularly disagree with much of what you say about the article although I think we should cherish as much as possible. My difficulty is merely that PROD seems to me not the best (or even appropriate) first step. I can see some useful reliable-seeming sources on the topic as a whole as well as on individual caves so I think something could be salvaged even without recourse to the books. Thincat (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

PROD wasn't the first step. As you can see, I started a conversation on the article's talk page back in October with little to no interest. PROD was step 2. Anyhoo, I'll stop replying here and carry it forward at the article's talk page, which is what I've been trying to do since October. Leitmotiv (talk) 17:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

List of caves of Maryland has been added to Articles for Deletion discussion

Hello Thincat,

Just a courtesy notice to let you know that the page has been added to Articles for Deletion here. Leitmotiv (talk) 01:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I probably won't take part in the discussion but thank you for informing me about this all the same. Thincat (talk) 08:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thincat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4