Thisismyusername96
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Jojalozzo 02:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Hello, I'm HitroMilanese. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yellow because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Hitro talk 20:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sea was changed by Thisismyusername96 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878568 on 2014-02-21T20:15:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joke, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Joke was changed by Thisismyusername96 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972725 on 2014-02-21T20:19:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Overlinking
Hello there. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you've been adding wikilinks to a few articles. However, several of them seem to be either unnecessary or lead to the wrong page. If a word is commonly used and the use on a page does not differ from the way it is commonly understood, it is not quite necessary to link to it. This goes for, amongst other things, your wikilink to world in Tables (board game). The other wikilink you added on that article, ancestors, leads to a page that is specifically about the concept of ancestry related to humans. You also added a link to Earth on the page Relative direction. This is pretty much the same case as with world above: a word we may assume the reader of the article to know and understand, especially because it is used in its common meaning. For some more information on what generally should not be linked, see WP:OVERLINK. If you need any help or have any questions, feel free to ask me here or on my talkpage. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jojalozzo 02:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chicken has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chicken was changed by Thisismyusername96 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964796 on 2014-02-24T16:30:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cocoa Krispies. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cocoa Krispies was changed by Thisismyusername96 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875582 on 2014-02-24T16:33:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vanilla, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Vanilla was changed by Thisismyusername96 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955859 on 2014-02-24T16:35:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Thisismyusername96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did do some vandalism but the first few things that the bot undid were not vandalism. Swear down. If you do not believe take a look at the edits I made to yellow and the sea. They were legit. Basically I did a bit of vandalism but this was outdone by the good stuff I did. Looking forward to being unblocked so I can get back down to editing. Thisismyusername96 (talk) 16:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Every single one of your edits is either useless or vandalism. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thisismyusername96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You are way off saying that all my edits were vandalism. If you went throughout them all you would have seen some of them were informative and interesting. I did make a few bad edits, I'll give you that, pal. But these were just accidental and the majority of the edits I did were top notch. I really want to get back down to editing and I would be dead chuffed if you could make this a reality. If you don't believe me look back at my edits, most of them were legit. My future is now in your hands, and you won't regret giving me another chance.
Decline reason:
None of them were informative, interesting, top notch, or "accidental". Kuru (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I didn't say all your edits were vandalism. I said all your edits were either useless or vandalism. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Thisismyusername96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sup, just wondering how much longer this block is gonna last. I've been waiting for ages to get down to some serious editing and I've got some big ideas about what to next. All I did was make one edit that was not legit and I want to take Wikipedia to the next level. C'mon dude, give me one more chance. I did loads of good edits before I made a cheeky little edit about chickens. I had praise for most of my edits and everyone was saying how decent they were. If this is still blocked, can I appeal the block again cos I'm desperate to get down to some serious editing. If you fellas won't let me use this account, can I open another because I'm ready to get down to some editing. Cheers.Thisismyusername96 (talk) 19:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I just looked through your edits, and can see only the vandalism and useless edits referred to above. I have not seen any evidence of anyone praising your work - and that isn't the usual procedure here with at the best minor edits. If your mates praised what you did, that doesn't count in your favour. How long? That's the piece of string question. The answer here is we don't know. Yet. Certainly there is no sign of taking Wikipedia to a higher level in your editing so far. I wouldn't think it possible for any one person to do, anyway.Peridon (talk) 20:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thisismyusername96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You wikipedians obviously don't recognise high quality editor! Ha ha I'm just kidding with you, I'm sure you know a talent when you see one. I'm gonna tell you about my edits one by one cos I think they've been misunderstood. My first four edits were adding links where there were none. I thought I did a great job. Then I made the sea and yellow articles more informative. Tell me pal, are the Simpsons not yellow, is the sea not called the deep blue? I then linked it all up in the carpet article, making it look more pro. Then I explained what a joke was in more detail. I've been told I'm a funny guy so I thought who better to explain a joke, you get me? Ha ha, no I'm not that funny but I know what a joke is so I wrote about it. I then improved a page about vanilla cos it's my fave ice cream. How are any of these vandalism, fella? Once I started editing I got bitten by the old wiki bug and couldn't get enough of it. Please give me another chance I think I can take wikipedia to the next level and get it some proper recognition. No offence pal, but some articles are stubs and all that and I think I could improve them. Please give me one more chance I will come back better than ever. All the edits I made were good and people were impressed by them. Please give me another chance pal I've already been banned for ages.Thisismyusername96 (talk) 9:49 pm, Yesterday (UTC+1)
Decline reason:
Yes, yes, you're hilarious - a career in comedy surely awaits you. However, Wikipedia isn't a comedy club. Talkpage access revoked to prevent further trollery. Bye now. Yunshui 雲水 10:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.