Thomas4321

Mucky Muck

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mucky Muck, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bfigura ^(talk) 03:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

The page appears to have been redirected to an already existing article. (And we already have an article on Muckrakers I believe, so that usage should be covered too). Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 04:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I see the distinction that you're drawing. But I think there's still the same problem. Wikipedia is not a dictionary or usage guide. Just because a term has been adopted by one (or even a few) people doesn't mean that it would merit an article, even if the people are famous. This might be better placed over at Wiktionary. Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 04:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)