Your submission at Articles for creation: Cupcakke (January 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thomasjolon, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Thomasjolon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

User-generated content

edit

Hi there, re: this edit, Genius.com is a user-generated website, which means that users contribute to the content found there. We should only be using reliable published sources that have established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. Other examples of insufficient user-generated sources: discussion forums, unverified Twitter accounts, IMDb, even Wikipedia itself. It's also pretty clear from the phrasing at the source that they are mirroring content found at Wikipedia, which would make it a circular reference. Anyhow, the birthdate has been removed until someone can find an unimpeachable reference. Thank you and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply