Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 161.165.196.84 (talk) 01:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Randy Moss

edit

Carter apparently still holds the Vikings record. Moss has 150 overall TDs but only 90 with the Vikings. See? Wknight94 talk 02:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThrashGuy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This block was for no reason, I didn't violate any policies. If this block doesn't violate the policy it should. I have been making productive contributions and will continue to. If I did do something, I didn't even receive warning. I would appreciate being unblocked.

Decline reason:

I am sorry that you misunderstood the rules, User:Gypsydog5150, but as a blocked user, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia at all, even with a different username. You, the human being, are blocked from editing- not merely the account you were using before. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThrashGuy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know what I did wrong. I have only made productive truthful edits.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of blocked user. --jpgordon::==( o ) 01:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThrashGuy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know what that means. I am so confused.

Decline reason:

You are a person. You the person had an account. You the person were blocked on that account. That meant that you the person may not create additional accounts, as per WP:EVADE. That means if you the person wish to ever edit Wikipedia, go back to your original account and never create others. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.