Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your user page, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's user page policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here? I'd appreciate hearing your views, such as your reasons for wanting this particular page and any alternatives you might accept.

There are several options available for resolving this matter:

  • If you can relieve my concerns through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
  • If you decide to delete the page yourself, please add {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it.
  • If the two of us can't agree on what needs to be done, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's user pages for discussion, which may result in the page in question being deleted.

Thank you. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 10:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


...........

Can you let me know what your concerns are? Tibradden (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


PS I thought I had written an article - have I put it in the wrong place?

Indeed, that is my main concern. Your user page is an exact copy of the article Wolfgang Holzmair - or rather of a previous version of that article. There is no problem with the article Wolfgang Holzmair - it needs some more cleanup, but the content is fine. Yet your user page and talk page are simply instruments of communication to other users of wikipedia, to let them know what you may want to tell about yourself and to get in touch with you. Keeping copies of other pages on your user page is considered inappropriate content. If you think you need a copy of the Holzmair article for experimental purposes, you may consider moving it to a subpage in your user name space, like User:Tibradden/Wolfgang Holzmair. See How do I create a user subpage? for guidance. But personally I think that there is no need for a copy, since the article Wolfgang Holzmair exists and seems to be stable. Hope I've cleared up the matter. No offence meant. Cheers! --FordPrefect42 (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


That's a relief - many thanks for the help! As you can gather I am new to Wikipedia and not at all on top of the technicalities - I am afraid I have no idea how the copy got made.... Perhaps you could delete it yourself, in case I get something else wrong?

I would also appreciate a few hints about cleanup -

cheers Tibradden (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Art song, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoffrey Parsons. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply