Proposed deletion of Cashbean

edit
 

The article Cashbean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. After checking the article's 8 sources and doing a WP:BEFORE search, I could only find 1 source that passes GNG. [1] The other sources were not independent (sounded like press releases) or did not have significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lucky commando films

edit

Regarding your !vote at this AfD, none of the entries listed are "big budget films." I'd also note that your rationales given at various technical colleges don't have any basis in policy that I can see. If you're going to participate in AfD discussions, you should do more than glance at the article, and be able to link any of your keep arguments to a relevant policy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

About Notability Tags

edit

Hi Tictictoc, you recently tagged an article (Elliot Bogod) for notability, Please take this down. I made an effort to include a few links. 103.19.141.1 (talk) 14:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, even though I'm removing the notability tags at your request, I'm also taking down the URLs you gave because they were self-published. Tictictoc (talk) 09:35, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:GermanKity per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GermanKity. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply