TigerC10

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Robotech Crystal Dreams Box.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Robotech Crystal Dreams Box.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

From TigerC10

It's all good. I thought I would be able to use it, but it ended up already having been uploaded. I didn't know how to delete it.

Proposed deletion of Toonami: Rare, Restored, and Recut

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Toonami: Rare, Restored, and Recut, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Toonami - Rare, Restored, and Recut.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Toonami - Rare, Restored, and Recut.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Naruto Narutimate Accel Series

Though they may not have the name right. Those are still real games in Japan. So they are true statements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keyblade626 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Not Valid Information

The statements are false, there is no US release date announced and it was uncited.

Naruto Narutimate Accel Series

You can solve that by adding a hidden message instead of adding visible notes.Tintor2 (talk) 17:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Lies in the article? where are they? Tintor2 (talk) 12:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

That message is fine, but it should be visible. When an anon is going to edit it, he will see the hidden message, if not all the articles would have visible notes.Tintor2 (talk) 00:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I didnt ask a question. The point is that you are not responding to my messages. Give me a reason why it should be visible. What GA, FA or FL use this type of comment?Tintor2 (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Plainly, such statements are not necessary. Either put it in a comment, or refrain from placing this unverifiable original research into these articles. Further attempts to place this warning into articles may be construed as disruptive, and blocks may be appropriate should your behavior continue. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 02:05, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

In other words, the Wikipedia staff is okay with using Wikipedia to spread lies as facts. Great. Well now I have officially quoted proof. and context. Thanks! TigerC10 (talk) 04:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

The note won't stop, for lack of a more elegant word, stupid people from adding false information. They will either a) not see it, b) ignore it and/or remove it, or c) rephrase it to reflect what their gullible minds believe as fact. The only thing the "essay" does (specifically when it's visible) is go against a number of Wikipedia policies and detract from what quality there is to be had. If someone adds false information regarding the game's name or release date, you revert them. If they keep doing it, you request that the article be semi-protected from editing or that the repeat offenders be blocked. That's the best that can be done on an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. ~SnapperTo 04:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:JavaHomepage in HotJava1.0.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JavaHomepage in HotJava1.0.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

File:WebRunner Flyer.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WebRunner Flyer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 11:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

File:JavaHomepage in HotJava1.0.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JavaHomepage in HotJava1.0.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 11:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC)