User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2016/1
Latest comment: 8 years ago by TheDarkLordSeth in topic Hi Again Version 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Timotheus Canens. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sockpuppet
I believe User:Whoopssorry is a sockpuppet, because his/her only edit was on the article Elagabalus and is trying to start an edit war making controversial edits to change the subject's gender. Psychotic Spartan 123 20:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Because you're less active these days, I went ahead and contacted DGG. Hope you're enjoying the new year! Psychotic Spartan 123 20:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 January 2016
- News and notes: The WMF's age of discontent
- In the media: Impenetrable science; Jimmy Wales back in the UAE
- Arbitration report: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case been decided
- Featured content: Featured menagerie
- WikiProject report: Try-ing to become informed - WikiProject Rugby League
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 13 January 2016
- Community view: Battle for the soul of the WMF
- Editorial: We need a culture of verification
- In focus: The Crisis at New Montgomery Street
- Op-ed: Transparency
- Traffic report: Pattern recognition: Third annual Traffic Report
- Special report: Wikipedia community celebrates Public Domain Day 2016
- News and notes: Community objections to new Board trustee
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Interview: outgoing and incumbent arbitrators 2016
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 20 January 2016
- News and notes: Vote of no confidence; WMF trustee speaks out
- In the media: 15th anniversary news round-up
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: This week's featured content
The Signpost: 27 January 2016
- News and notes: Geshuri steps down from the Board
- In the media: Media coverage of the Arnnon Geshuri no-confidence vote
- Recent research: Bursty edits; how politics beat religion but then lost to sports; notability as a glass ceiling
- Traffic report: Death and taxes
- Featured content: This week's featured content
Hi Again Version 2
Umm, my latest message from December got archived so I couldn't get a final answer. My question was: "If I disagree I could still appeal this, right? Could you refer me to the proper channel to do it? It's still confuses me. There seems to be more than one channel where appeals take place." Once I get an answer I can proceed accordingly. Thanks. TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 10:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Bump? TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I saw this and then forgot about it. There are three possible channels, as outlined in WP:AC/DS#Appeals and modifications: to WP:AN, to WP:AE, or to the committee at WP:ARCA. It's your choice. T. Canens (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Given your experience, and your knowledge with my case, which channel would you recommend or believe is the most appropriate? TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- I suspect that you might have a better chance at AN than at AE. T. Canens (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll get to making a case at some point when I have time. Will let you know since you're been involved in this process. TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 12:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- I suspect that you might have a better chance at AN than at AE. T. Canens (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Given your experience, and your knowledge with my case, which channel would you recommend or believe is the most appropriate? TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I saw this and then forgot about it. There are three possible channels, as outlined in WP:AC/DS#Appeals and modifications: to WP:AN, to WP:AE, or to the committee at WP:ARCA. It's your choice. T. Canens (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)