Hans Diller

edit

I have created a better explanation for the whole thing here. I just want to point out that I made 1 edit and did not revert. It certainly seems I was blocked not for that 1 edit but rather for discussing anything with members of the deWiki sect. If you disagree with my view I would be most appreciative of any further guidance. --Law Lord (talk) 12:44, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

So basically the story is that you or some other students stumbled upon that name, found it funny and now you still think that this fact belongs into an encyclopedia? Wow... But yes, you were also blocked because of your reaction that was pretty much trolling (e.g. your actions against Wahrerwattwurm who is also a contributor of fr-wp). Well, and I already told you how to appeal that block. --Tinz (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could I get your opinion here:User talk:Law Lord#Hans Diller? Fences&Windows 01:20, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it seems like your comment was reverted so I won't comment there. But of course I agree with you and Himalayan Explorer, who probably didn't exactly expect something like this when he said "You may now expand as you wish" ;) --Tinz (talk) 15:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Also see User talk:Fences and windows#Hans Diller. If I didn't always assume good faith I'd think I was being trolled. Fences&Windows 16:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Thanks for reverting the ongoing edits to The Vagina Monologues article. I saw it popping up in Recent Changes but couldn't undo it fast enough. Brammers (talk) 20:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, I saw it just by chance, clicking around searching for an interesting read... --Tinz (talk) 22:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


Fresh violation by a ruwiki checkuser

edit

Here checkuser Kv75 disclosed personally identifiable information about a user. He disclosed that the user is located in Moscow. Publishing whereabouts is prohibited by the privacy policy. (Previously Kv75 openly speculated about other users' travel.) SA ru (talk) 04:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi SA ru, it's better to use e-mail for these things. I do not check this page very often since dewiki is my home wiki. I will look at your complaint, however I don't have much time at the moment and the are ombudsmen are pretty inactive, so it might take some more days. --Tinz (talk) 22:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
By the way, now ru_wiki checkusers started to routinely reveal the IP addresses of the users. You really need a native Russian speaker on your team to monitor what is going on at ru_wiki. SA ru (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

MicroRNA

edit

Hi Tinz: Because the debate about translation inhibition and mRNA degradation is not resolved yet, I respectfully disagree with your conclusions about the Bartel paper from last week. Would like to know your thoughts at Talk:MicroRNA#Translation_inhibition_versus_transcript_degradation and I look forward to working on a balanced description of the debate and its history. Best regards MiRroar (talk) 14:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the message, I answered there. --Tinz (talk) 17:55, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply