Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 14:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thee Hypnotics

edit

I have reverted your edits to this page. You might like to read Wikipedia:Five pillars before proceeding much further with your editing. A particularly important prerequisite is Wikipedia:Verifiability - "In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it."

This article is already light on reliable sources - please do not increase the proportion that is not verified.

In addition, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and, as such, relies on editors presenting a neutral point of view on articles. Outlandish claims, rock music journalistic styled speak, heresay, etc., however well meant is completely contrary to the editing protocols outlined at Five pillars, and its associated pages. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Having left a suitable time frame for others to contribute, I have undertaken a radical editing of the article. This is so it complies with the general editing guidelines outlined at Five pillars, and I have also added a considerable number of reliable sources. The article is still light on sources, but I think that my edits have left the article in a more balanced, and encyclopedic, state than has ever been the case to date. Regards,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply