Hello Toby Lott, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Toby Lott, good luck, and have fun.TR536 (talk) 10:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Mansion House - Hurstpierpoint (June 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
Fiddle Faddle 09:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Toby Lott, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Mansion House - Hurstpierpoint (July 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
Fiddle Faddle 07:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials

edit

It is vital that to read and act on this in order for any copyright materials to remain. The draft will inevitably be deleted unless you do. If it is deleted before you do that is not a problem since, once the correct procedure has been followed, it can and will be resurrected.

We need evidence that the copyright material can be released into Wikipedia, and we cannot take just your say so, as I am sure you can imagine and will agree. Fiddle Faddle 07:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Make sure you submit the evidence that Maggie has donated the copyright correctly (click the title of this section) and you will have no problem. Also note the OTRS applied for thing you can add to the draft. ADD that thing! Fiddle Faddle 10:52, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I see it in the draft, but please make sure you have also submitted it as specified at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials through the OTRS system. I know it's a pain, but it's a necessary one. Fiddle Faddle 12:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I have the formal donation from Maggie, and I have submitted it to the system for approval. The fact that I have submitted it is now on the article. That is one hurdle jumped. It has to be approved, but that is a matter of process.
There is the next hurdle. Maggie's work is her original research except where backed with significant coverage of the house, independent of it and in WP:RS. This is a hurdle that may be harder to jump. So find references for each fact that you can. Be prepared to base the draft on Maggie's work, but please do not be wed to 100% of her work.
I have now become too involved with this article to provide a competent and unbiased review myself, so will help you all I can, but cannot actually review it now. Fiddle Faddle 17:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
An OTRS volunteer has responded to Maggie with advice about licencing, since her original release has been judged to be insufficient. I may not reproduce that email here under the rules which keep emails confidential, even ones of this businesslike nature. Maggie will have received the email earlier today. Please liaise with her to help her make a decision. If she replies directly to the email, despite the fact it was sent to me, cc her, with permission to use the correct licence then all will move forwards, albeit slowly. The system is heavily backlogged. Fiddle Faddle 06:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Mansion House - Hurstpierpoint (July 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
Fiddle Faddle 13:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 8 July

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Mansion House - Hurstpierpoint

edit

There is a side conversation at User talk:Davidwr#Draft:Mansion House - Hurstpierpoint which you may want to read and possibly join in on. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Mansion House - Hurstpierpoint was accepted

edit
 
Mansion House - Hurstpierpoint, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 06:35, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Mansion House, Hurstpierpoint concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mansion House, Hurstpierpoint, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mansion House, Hurstpierpoint

edit
 

Hello Toby Lott. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Mansion House".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Mansion House, Hurstpierpoint}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Hurstpierpoint High Street Lyndsey Smith.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hurstpierpoint High Street Lyndsey Smith.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peter James (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply