Almighty Camel

Welcome!

Hello, Toe of the Almighty Camel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

The normal way to "disagree" is a discussion on the article talk page, simply click on "Talk" above the article and start it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Warning templates

Please don't post frivolous "warning" templates on users, as you did here. It's disruptive and pointlessly confrontational. The user hadn't attacked you. Bishonen | talk 22:27, 15 May 2015 (UTC).

There was nothing "frivolous" about it. Unsubstantiated claims of sock-puppetry constitutes a personal attack.

I provided diffs [1][2][3] of 3 separate occurrences in the warning. Enjoy. Toe of the Almighty Camel (talk) 22:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

I saw your diffs. They weren't accusations or claims. Bishonen | talk 22:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC).

Maybe the first diff, because the user said twice it wasn't an "accusation", I can agree with you. That instance was just to disparage my character. And I removed it without response. The second and third diffs were increasingly accusatory, the user even claiming to have "evidence".

• "Your revert has me thinking you are not new. I found some more info on this I will not indulge you with. Some interesting, and rather faulty evidence I have found too."
• "Well I guess every experienced user on this case are just wrong and a supposedly new user is always right."
• "And I'd rather not indulge you with the other info, since what I found may need intervention."

Toe of the Almighty Camel (talk) 22:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

@Bishonen:

I added the quotes above from TheGracefulSlick for you to read. If you already have and decided not to apologize for your false statement, I'm disappointed.

If you we unaware and hadn't read them, here's your chance as you've been officially pinged. Thanks. Almighty Camel (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

You're funny. First you assume I hadn't seen the diffs in your "Warning" on TheGracefulSlick's page, even though I commented on them ("the user hadn't attacked you"), so you give them again; then you assume I haven't seen these either, and quote them. I think I can manage without any further "chances" to look at them, thanks. TheGracefulSlick doesn't think you're a new user — big deal. I don't either, and you can see others saying the same on ANI. (See the last sentence here.) Nobody with any experience here would take you for a new user.

This account has so far been dealing in trolling and confrontation, seizing every opportunity to behave obnoxiously (starting with the account name). I hope you'll take the new username as your cue for more constructive editing. If not, you'll soon find yourself blocked indefinitely. Please don't waste your time responding to me with a mouthful of alphabet soup. Bishonen | talk 11:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC).

Thanks for the compliment, as humor is necessary to a happy life. I don't really care what others think, but I cannot allow personal attacks. Which was why I justifiably warned the offender. All I did was stated the facts, truth is not relative. Your personal prejudice aside. Almighty Camel (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for disruptive editing (edit warring, among other things). If you wish to appeal this block, you may use {{unblock}}. --Rschen7754 19:27, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Almighty Camel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

If I had intended to edit war, I would've reverted this edit to the Clinton Foundation. Instead I worked to immediately collaborate on the talk page here. I didn't take the bait. And quite frankly I'm proud of myself for being so understanding with the disruptive editors. Almighty Camel (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2015 (UTC) NEW INFORMATION Blocking administrator may have been influenced by this speculation which occurred 15 minutes before I was blocked. I request a Wikipedia:CHECKUSER to prove I'm not anyone else. It's only fair, as I believe the blocking administrator acted on false premises. Almighty Camel (talk) 19:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Obvious troll is obvious. Diannaa (talk) 19:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Personal attack removed)

Because of that last outburst, Almighty Camel, I've removed your ability to edit your Talk page. Further unblock requests should be made in accordance with the instructions at WP:Guide to appealing blocks. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MuhammadArtExhibit.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MuhammadArtExhibit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

File:MuhammadArtExhibit.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MuhammadArtExhibit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)