Tommyt

Welcome!

Hello Tommyt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Predator (film)

Re Might Have been vandalism, It was! Thanks for reverting. Orangutan 14:08, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Morley???

Orangutan, perhaps you can tell me, who the hell is Rob Morley? What the heck does he have to do with Predator or Wiki vandalism? Tommyt 16:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

• Most likley the author of the edits! The IP adress used came from the U.K. so it's probably some kid who is bored on his easter holidays. If it had been a U.S kid it would have probably been Chuck Norris or Poopy, They seem to be the current vandalism memes Orangutan 17:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

• • Thanks, I thought it might've been one of those repeated vandalism things, you know, the fun thing to do liked subbing the word "pwned" for "beaten" in the '92 LA Riots article. Damnable lil' punks!! Tommyt 17:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Auschwitz

Hi there: at Auschwitz the crematoria and gas chambers, of which there were four at Birkenau, were each built as an integrated unit; the bodies were just taken through a door from the gas chamber to the crematorium. I think that the sonderkommando revolt in reality destroyed both crematorium and gas chamber.--Anthony.bradbury 18:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, you're most likely right. The chapter dealing w/this in Nyszli's book talks only about the crematorium but its reasonable to think the gas chambers were damaged or destroyed too. Thanks. Tommyt 01:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Day of the Dead

That's okay. And I myself apologise for using "abuse." I didn't mean it in the strong way you took it, but I could have used a different word. --Bacteria 12:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

LOTR grammar

Thanks for your work on the plot summaries. I'm generally concerned with getting information across with the right references. Thanks. Wiki-newbie 19:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Manual of Style

Please see the Style Manual given in the links in your recent welcome message. Please don't revert edits to conform punctuation to that. Jonathunder 22:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Nice job on the grammar editing for Children of Men. :) Arcayne 18:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks!! I hate HATE it when people use the words "but" or "get" when there are many other, better ways to say the same thing! Tommyt 18:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Braveheart edits

Yes, I was hoping to avoid placement of the tag myself (was going to watch the movie again to refresh my memory before going through the plot synopsis to clean out rubbish). I'll begin 'cleaning out the garage' tomorrow, and feel free to contribute your grammar fun as well :)Arcayne 22:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, Tommy, I think the soundtrack stuff can stay until we decide to set up a sub-page and article. The music meets the "notable and interesting" criteria for in clusion, but I agree that it makes the article too long. I have never set up a sub page before, though. A lot of FA class articles have soundtrack sections and sub-pages about soundtracks. We have to remember to balance the need for a trimmer article with retaining the requirement that it doesn't lose that which makes it interesting. Maybe we could add it back in, for now, until we set up a sub-page. Could I impose upon you to do that, since I never have?Arcayne 23:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

No proble. I think a lot of users there feel constrained by the lack of sources connecting the film to historical inaccuracies, and are pinning all their efforts on this single one. I know ther are other sources out there. I should probably go out and find them this weekend. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism Question

Glad to know you hate em too. First off, unfortunately, you can't just block one off the bat. See this page (Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace) for messages to place on a vandals talk page. Typically for first offenses you'd use the warning under level two, afterwards level four. If they are still vandalizing after these two warnings, you can report them to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, where an admin will see your request and proceed (in most cases) to block the vandal. Glad to answer you questions, and if you have any further inquiries just drop me a message on my talk page. PeteShanosky 21:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Beezus and Ramona

Beezus and Ramona I noticed you deleted a large part of that atricle in April, and you were right in saying that it was in need of fixing in grammar, but next time you decide to delete what was put in there, just fix it for grammar and then put it back in. --24.225.156.40 17:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Mea culpa...

I could swear that I heard the dialogue in my head & I thought it was soixante. Just watched the film & you're right. Thanks. Hrrrmmm, gotta wonder how stuff like that gets past the DVD team...? Ever see the typos in Battle Royale? They're horrendous!Tommyt 02:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

No worries! AirOdyssey (Talk) 02:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Fact tag at Hollow Man

Hi. When adding a {{fact}} tag (or any other cleanup/maintenance tag), please try to remember to specify the full name of the month rather than an abbreviation (e.g. "October" instead of "Oct") in the "date" parameter. This is needed for categorisation of the article into the appropriate maintenance category (in this case, Category:Articles with unsourced statements since October 2007). You can also just add the tag without the date parameter, and a bot will get to it. Thanks, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 16:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Apocalypse Now summary

No, I disagree, I understand it's a synopsis, but you've included details in completely the wrong places, and the text appears to be extremely similar to a copyrighted source. I will attempt to provide a source for you, do reply. And I have seen the film, so you don't need to tell me it's a existentialist drama! I look forward to your reply.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

OK, will do. I assume you will check the other plot summaries while you're at it, I have seen much worse. I'll have it soon.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 10:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Sunshine

I've tried to trim the Plot at Sunshine (2007 film). Thoughts? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

No kidding; I've tried to downplay the importance of the Plot section whenever I can. The film is generally widely accessible for everyone to watch. One thing that is nice about such bloated sections, though, one can review the details and figure out how to summarize even if it's been a while after seeing the film. I enjoyed the film a lot, though, because of all the real-world details that I discovered in expanding the article. I'd like to continue improving, especially with the Critical reaction section (which I avoided before, not having seen it yet). I can't watch the commentary, though; I'm deaf, and I use subtitles to follow films. Audio commentaries rarely ever have subtitles to accompany them, and Sunshine wasn't one of the exceptions. Feel free to share the revelation from the commentary? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 03:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

And I thought Ernest Hemingway was a master of being succinct? :-P —Erik (talk • contrib) - 03:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Haha, Ayn Rand's definitely more verbose. Can you tell me what the revelation in the commentary was? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you misunderstood -- I've already seen the film, so I welcome the extra detail. Thanks for telling me -- I actually figured from what you hinted that it had to do with Trey's suicide being faked. I remember the shot with Mace taking out the scalpel, so that makes a lot of sense. That was a nice, subtle detail. You sure it shouldn't be added to the article? We can cite the commentary. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I don't think we need to mention that Pinbacker stole the scalpel to kill Corazon, but we can put "apparently" in relation to Trey's suicide. I've made an attempt -- let me know what you think. We can point out other plot details using this, too, perhaps. Did the director elaborate on the odd time/space ending of the film? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't want to discuss what the ending could be, since I know there will be original interpretations of it. I was just wondering if the director commented on what the ending meant during the commentary. I agree, though, it'd be a good idea to start discussion to see if we can't incorporate interpretations somehow. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

apoc now

Not especially, it's just I don't judge you as being at the top of my priority list. All better?--Hammerandclaw (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I was actually referring to you getting so concerned over me not responding to your messages, but obvoiusly you failed to pick up on this. Speaking of which I waited longer for you to respond to me, than me to you, did you realise that? Third of all, I intend to re-write that summary, properly, and I won't need you to assist me in any way, so take leave.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 21:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Anyone offering assistance, I appreciate their offer, but not yours, since you couldn't actually write it yourself, no?--Hammerandclaw (talk) 10:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

You're trying to tell me you work for Wikipedia? To quoteyou, "I tried to change the page but it was overturned." That seems to demonstrate other users were not impressed with your changes, so maybe you are not qualified to write the article after all. Care to explain what you tried to do?--Hammerandclaw (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

The napalm quote was there when I last checked. Anyway, your knowledge and interest in the film

is certainly not to be argued with, be it true, and, same as you I find the film, the war in general and the themes of the movie very interesting, but I still cannot bring myself to agree with you, in the main. Hmmm, tell you what, perhaps I shall try and locate the original writer of the article and vouch for his opinion. Till then, I'll leave the article alone.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Really? My (admittely short) research turned up a user called The Cuncuter, or something to that effect. I'll have a look....--Hammerandclaw (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant whoever wrote the original article, that was changed, as opposed to the new writer, but I suppose I should see the new guy too.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

"sigh" I can't seem to relocate the synopsis, it appears to be have been moved or deleted from the original site. Again, crud.....I still maintain that that article needs to be re-written however--Hammerandclaw (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

No country....

No prob. I just liked it because after seeing it three times I'm still impressed with the landscape images. Just thought it worthwhile to attempt to add some of it to the description. Happy editing!
Jim Dunning | talk 22:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Films? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! —Erik (talk • contrib) 16:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome aboard! The template below can help you navigate the WikiProject. —Erik (talk • contrib) 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for March has been published. April's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! —Erik (talk • contrib) 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films April 2009 Newsletter

The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films May 2009 Newsletter

The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films June 2009 Newsletter

The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2009 Newsletter

The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:24, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Voting

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS October Newsletter

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call

Thanks for contacting me, the assessment process can be confusing (took me a while to get the hang of it, and sometimes I still scratch my head when assessing particular articles). For each article, you should look it over and determine if it should remain at the class it is currently assessed at or if it should be down/upgraded to another class. For example, if the article is currently a Start-class article, and you think it does not meet the Start-class criteria (to an extent), then downgrade it to Stub. If it's fine where it's at, then you don't have to make any changes (not every article will change). If you think it's worthy of C-class, check it against the B-class criteria (if it doesn't meet all of them then it's C-class). If the film is made by a particular country (say France), then make sure it is tagged with the French task force. If it's missing an image/infobox, then add the parameter to the banner. It's up to you if you want to make changes to the article (I usually quickly fix glaring issues and move on, check my recent contributions to see the type of changes I've been making as well as a general idea of how I assess articles). If you want to improve an article to make sure it meets the next class, then feel free, this drive is about improvement. If you want to make no changes and just do assessments, that works too. If you're just starting, I'd recommend taking on range(s) from the Stub-class list as those articles have rarely changed, and if they have they most likely only meet the Start-class criteria. Hopefully this answers your question (maybe too much), but if you still would like further clarification, please let me know. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Glad to see you're taking a stab at it. I looked through a few of the ones you've looked at and have some thoughts. The article Boogeyman (film), only has a plot/cast section, so I would tend to downgrade its class from Start to Stub. I probably would assess Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 to C-class with it being {{Film|class=C|B-Class-1=no|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=no|B-Class-5=yes|American-task-force=yes}}. Articles like Boomerang (1947 film) should definitely remain as is. Remember that articles don't have to exactly meet the criteria set at the project's assessment page, just use your best judgment. For the Bootstrap Bill Turner article, our project does cover film characters so it is within our scope. I'd say it's borderline Stub/Start (since it's mainly plot details), but when its borderline, I say round up. If an article is missing an infobox/image or if it falls under one of our task forces, then just copy and paste the formatting at this page into the banner. Let me know if you'd like further clarification. You can also check my contributions to see some of the recent assessments I've done for the last 100 articles I've reviewed (plus the ones forthcoming). --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

The assessments and improvement parameters/task forces go on the talk page within the Film banner. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

I removed the talk page banner from the articles and moved them to the talk pages for you. For example, see these diffs for Boogeyman and Book of Shadows. For the articles themselves, we don't include talk page banners. Assessments are only handled on the talk page (since the reader doesn't need to know about it to understand the article). --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The article was redirected to the list back in December. The ranges were developed back in August, so it is likely that some pages have been merged, already re-assessed, or even deleted. So far, in the ranges I've worked in, I've seen all three. If this happens, you can bypass the page and continue with the next film article. If it does redirect to another page, it would be a good idea to go to the talk page of the redirect and if the film banner is still there, remove it. If you need any further clarification, please let me know. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Table of contents

The reason it doesn't have one is because the article only consists of a plot and cast section. If additional sections were added, a table of contents would appear (usually it's included if there are three or more sections within the article). You can learn more about table of contents here. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, fellow film fan!

This is to ask for your input on Balalaika, MGM 1939. Though I'm a good editor/copy writer and have been working on it since August (09), this is my first major research project of any description, anywhere. User talk:Nehrams2020 has been kind enough to help me, and I'm hoping you will look the article over; I would really appreciate your comments and suggestions, especially additional free sources of information/photos, to round it off nicely. Thank you, Shir-El too 16:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Deathtrap

I think Deathtrap's plot summary at 593 words is in pretty good shape now. What do you think? --Ring Cinema (talk) 00:09, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space

Hey there Tommyt, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Tommyt. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of images removed today here

• Shut off the bot here

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 02:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Blade Runner

I will respond to your message on the article talk page. But, simply put, I think you are right. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 22:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

		WP:FILM Tireless Contributor
		This is to acknowledge and thank you for your participation in tagging and assessing 1,000 articles in WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive 2009-2010. You have helped to ensure our project has a better idea of the articles under our scope. I appreciate your efforts in further helping the project! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

You can either copy the formatting here on the talk page if you want to keep the entire box, or if you want to use the formatting I have on my user page, you just need to use a gallery. See my user page to see how to format it. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:15, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Article help

Hi. I found this article while browsing the recent changes. It's messy and seems to be nothing but an article filled with biographies of notable students.

I don't know what to do about this, can you do something? Reply on my talk page, please.

Math321 (talk) 20:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tommyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

198.242.211.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "J1ozone17". The reason given for J1ozone17's block is: "Spam / advertising-only account".

• Blocking administrator: HJ Mitchell (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Looks like you share an IP with a spammer. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Anything I can do about it? Tommyt (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice

A Request for Comment has been called at Talk:Watchmen. As a registered editor who has edited that page over the past year, you may wish to comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.

• Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
• Get involved in some of our special projects:
  • Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
  • Help develop a template for citing archival collections
  • Write guides to accessing and using library resources

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tommyt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tommyt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tommyt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)