User talk:Tomtomn00/Archives/10

Talking to 'bots' on wiki

It fascinates me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuLuPress (talk • contribs) 21:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

LuLuPress, sign your posts. I also did them welcomes manually. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 21:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

i save them by the basket. true story, for the rescue i used to be the chairman of =D ~lulu

LuLuPress (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Section Tags (Repost)

Hello Tomtomn00. I've been cleaning out the backlog of articles tagged with the "Divide into sections" maintenance tag for the past six months. I'm curious as to why you've been attaching the tag to extremely short articles (Kamunyuini, Mesua daphnifolia, Tarnawka Druga, Bamulia, Mount Synge). These are all articles of one sentence and cannot be divided into sections; I've removed the tag. The tag is typically (but not solely) used when an article is at least two or three paragraphs long and has enough different topics so that sections are truly of benefit (see Doing Difference, Samuel Hutton, Parallel parking). Can you help me understand your rationale? Thanks.JimVC3 (talk) 03:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

The are the same articles which another user pointed out. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 16:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited Jon Doscher, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages My Left Foot, Hell's Kitchen and In the Name of the Father (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Slow down please!

Your tagging of articles is in many instances incorrect. An article that has links that verify article content is not unreferenced - supporting material does not need to be listed under a section explicitly titled "references" in order to be referenced random example 1, random example 2. In addition, you added this incorrect tag as well as this one this one to Thomas Calter. How is the Dictionary of National Biography a primary affiliated with Calter? What type of copy-editing do you suggest the article needs? Why did you tag this perfectly acceptable stub for copy-edit? I strongly suggest that you seek adoption from a more experienced editor - I applaud your enthusiasm, but you're working much to fast without actually understanding the guidelines for the tasks you're trying to accomplish. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Based on this completely incorrect tagging I have to ask that you stop adding clean-up tags from articles altogether until you either find someone to adopt you who can walk you through the process, or you can demonstrate that you are capable or understanding the clean-up templating guidelines and the nuances involved. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)