User talk:TonyBallioni/Archive 43
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:TonyBallioni. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 |
Just checking in
It's that time of year - have you thought again about running for ArbCom? Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Even if I wanted to run, haven't been active enough this year where I'd have a shot. Though, on the bright side, this was the last day I'll have to work more than 8 hours until February... TonyBallioni (talk) 06:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- Enjoy your free time - hopefully we'll see you around more often. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- So, you were in town and didn't even stop by my page for a "hello" and a virtual glass of bubbly? You've changed, man.-- Ponyobons mots 17:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Water to Thrive for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Water to Thrive, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water to Thrive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
- The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
- An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
Technical news
- A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
Arbitration
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
- The proposed decision for the 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system is open.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
- A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.
Miscellaneous
- Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add
/64to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.
IPv6
Hi, Tony. I've just seen User:TonyBallioni/Just block the /64. I wonder I it might be worth just adding a note saying that an IPv6 address is one with colons rather than with dots. Possibly by now everybody knows that, but I wouldn't be totally surprised if there are still a few administrators who don't; certainly there were some as recently as just a few years ago. JBW (talk) 13:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi JBW, feel free to add it wherever you think is best. Agree that it could be a useful addition but don't know the best way to phrase it! TonyBallioni (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Contentious topics procedure adopted
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions review process.
The Arbitration Committee has concluded the 2021-22 review of the contentious topics system (formerly known as discretionary sanctions), and its final decision is viewable at the revision process page. As part of the review process, the Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The above proposals that are supported by an absolute majority of unrecused active arbitrators are hereby enacted. The drafting arbitrators (CaptainEek, L235, and Wugapodes) are directed to take the actions necessary to bring the proposals enacted by this motion into effect, including by amending the procedures at WP:AC/P and WP:AC/DS. The authority granted to the drafting arbitrators by this motion expires one month after enactment.
The Arbitration Committee thanks all those who have participated in the 2021-22 discretionary sanctions review process and all who have helped bring it to a successful conclusion. This motion concludes the 2021-22 discretionary sanctions review process.
This motion initiates a one-month implementation period for the updates to the contentious topics system. The Arbitration Committee will announce when the initial implementation of the Committee's decision has concluded and the amendments made by the drafting arbitrators in accordance with the Committee's decision take effect. Any editors interested in the implementation process are invited to assist at the implementation talk page, and editors interested in updates may subscribe to the update list.
For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
|
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} | 
|
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is SashiRolls requests a !ban. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:10, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello TonyBallioni: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, RV (talk) 16:09, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
Merry Christmas, Tony!
Hello TonyBallioni: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, TheSandDoctor Talk 18:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
From my family to yours: Merry Christmas! TheSandDoctor Talk 18:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа!
Hello, TonyBallioni! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:25, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:57, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
_(14573454469).jpg)
.jpg)
_(14752756965).jpg)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:57, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, TonyBallioni!
TonyBallioni,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 02:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy new era
- I want to frame it. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy Kalends of January
|
Happy New Year! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC) |
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello TonyBallioni,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Hi TonyBalloni. Just letting you know about this as a courtesy since you are the administrator who blocked Suedeakin01. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.
Arbitration
- Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, CaptainEek, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Primefac, SilkTork.
- The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
- Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Speedy deletion of hoaxes
Hello TonyBallioni, would you please reconsider the speedy deletion of Draft:JatinDesler and Draft:Kraist Search, the drafts were part of a series of hoaxes created by User:81.105.210.208. Thanks. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- I don't consider someone making up a page about themselves and something they want to build a hoax, which is what those appear to me to be. G13 will take care of them in 6 months. TonyBallioni (talk) 08:41, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Attacks after election
I participated in the Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022. For that, I am facing some issues probably. Suppose, my stubbed article Arshiya Das has been nominated for deletion. But the subject is definitely a notable one and she also got recognition Pradhan Mantri Rashtriya Bal Puraskar from government of India for her outstanding career graph. I think I am possibly right on the topic. So, I shall not participate in the next elections anymore. Copy to : see here Wikifulness (talk) 12:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Contentious topics procedure now in effect
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's contentious topics procedure revision process.
In December, the Arbitration Committee adopted the contentious topics procedure, which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period.
- For a detailed summary of the changes from the discretionary sanctions system, see WP:DSVSCT.
- A brief guide for administrators may be found at Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Administrator instructions.
- Updated templates may be found at Template:Contentious topics.
- Suggestions and concerns may be directed to the arbitration clerk team at WT:AC/C.
The drafting arbitrators warmly thank all those who have worked to implement the new procedure during this implementation period and beyond. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Coldwell AN
Thanks for the good summary and timely close. Implementation questions are popping up on my talk, so my first order of business today is to get a sub-page going at GA where questions and work can be centralized. Once I've done that, would you be willing to add it in to your closing statement, so people know where to go for info? Bst, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Meaning pointing to something like User:SandyGeorgia/sandbox9 at the top of the closing, which will be moved to a GA subpage later today, once we settle on the name. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia, sure thing. Just let me know the location when its done and I'll add it to the close. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much; there is no hurry on this, and I want to be sure we get it right before moving to a GA subpage. I'll let you know; right now I'm stretched way too thin having to answer all the implementation queries and work out implementation details all over the place, so I hope to have this page in place by tomorrow. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I'll check in at some point tomorrow evening East Coast time. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Got it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I'll check in at some point tomorrow evening East Coast time. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much; there is no hurry on this, and I want to be sure we get it right before moving to a GA subpage. I'll let you know; right now I'm stretched way too thin having to answer all the implementation queries and work out implementation details all over the place, so I hope to have this page in place by tomorrow. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia, sure thing. Just let me know the location when its done and I'll add it to the close. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Update: I will not get my sandbox moved to a GA subpage today; there are too many loose ends I want to wrap up first. Maybe tomorrow ? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Ready: whew, an already complex, never-before-attempted endeavor, was made even more difficult with the planned GAR process revamping, so I ended up with more work than envisioned, and seem to have become the coordinator of keeping all the pieces together. Anyway, it's finally launched in a GA subpage, after my attempts to wrangle everyone I could to review. Two things:
- Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 can now be added to the closing statement.
- In the History section of the AN, my original post indicated 233 GAs. My typical typos, the actual number is 223, and that typo could cause some bookkeeping concerns down the road. Is it OK if I go in and add a note below that to correct that typo?
Thanks again, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia done. And yes, I don't have a problem with a minor correction of a typo in a close section. IAR, not a bureaucracy, etc. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thx, Tony; done. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia done. And yes, I don't have a problem with a minor correction of a typo in a close section. IAR, not a bureaucracy, etc. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
- Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.
Technical news
- The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
- In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
- Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Arbitration case notification
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Holocaust in Poland and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, GeneralNotability (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Arbitration case
Hello. As evidenced by the recent essay by mainstream historians Jan Grabowski and Shira Klein, Wikipedia has allowed severe distortions of history including the insertion of anti-semitic tropes in various articles related to the Holocaust in Poland. Decisions by administrators and arbitrators have enabled the perpetrators. Have a nice week, Robby.is.on (talk) 13:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Robby.is.on: Wikipedia administrators don't make content decisions. We make conduct decisions. The editor you are discussing is now one of the most prolific sockmasters we have (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/יניב הורון). I wrote a large part of the essay that advocates blocking anti-semites on sight. I certainly agree with you that anything that is anti-semitic should be removed from Wikipedia; the problem with Yaniv is that his approach was and is running around edit warring and attacking anyone who disagreed with him rather than following our established methods for handling such problematic content. While I understand that this has come up again recently, I really don't want to speak about it much more because the topic area has become so toxic that any explanation that strays much beyond 'he had a long history of conduct that fell short of our standards' has the potential to be taken out of context. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- The edit summary was "rv antisemitic vandalism", clearly referring to the content being reverted.
Calling content inserted by another editor who is not an anti-semitic troll “antisemitic vandalism” is a personal attack
,He called an established editor a vandal over a content dispute, and no, it was commenting on a contributor, bot content.
– I disagree. Adding anti-semitic content or being accused of this does not necessarily mean one is anti-semitic the same way doing a stupid thing does not necessarily make one stupid. Wikipedia administrators don't make content decisions.
If you're judging an editor for their description of another editor's content addition you're making a content decision. Imagine you'd be knowledgeable to enough to judge whether certain content is anti-semitic and content that is clearly anti-semitic were called out as such. Would that still be wrong? Robby.is.on (talk) 10:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)- Yaniv had and long history of behavior that violated policies and guidelines, and there were many sanctions leading up to his block. If any other editor had acted in this way about any other topic area, they would have been blocked as well.While I appreciate your concerns, the banned user who appears to be the source of framing these accusations has waged a years-long campaign targeting individuals off-wiki for any action that he disagrees with. The employment and family of those in this topic area have been subject to abuse as well. I do not feel comfortable responding beyond what I have said given that the source of this journal article appears to be Icewhiz, a serial violator of the English Wikipedia's policy on harassment. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- The edit summary was "rv antisemitic vandalism", clearly referring to the content being reverted.
Jonathan Karp
Hello! Back in 2017, you participated in a discussion about which projects to mention in Jonathan Karp's biography. I've submitted an edit request to include mention of some the books for which he was the principal acquirer and publisher, as verified in secondary coverage summarizing his career. I'm hoping you might be willing to contribute to the ongoing discussion, or review any of the other edit requests I've submitted at Talk:Jonathan Karp. Thanks in advance for any assistance! Inkian Jason (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
IP block exemptions
Sir I'm using public wifi.i need IP block exemptions right. please give it.thank you Sourav80 (talk) 17:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
Technical news
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
Arbitration
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Suspected sock of blocked sockpuppet Iamfrzu07/ Farzanfa007
- Iamfarzan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Akevsharma (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
This page Shaiju Damodaran is created by user:Akevsharma ,on checking the pic uploaded in the page, its uploaded by user:Iamfarzan , when clicking the user page link of user:Iamfarzan it redirects to user:Akevshama. He has renamed the user page to hide that same user uploaded the image. Is is COI as well ?
User account created on 14 April 2020 similar to Iamfrzu07 and after block of Iamfrzu07, which was Created on 14 March 2020
user:Akevsharma aka user:Iamfarzan created around 30+ pages and all pages are related to ISL and kerala blasters.
user:Akevsharma aka user:Iamfarzan edited Manjappada as well on 17 December 2020. link - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Farzanfa007 Its pretty evident its a sock. Please check Christopheronthemove (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Honest Question Here
I see you closed an RFC on race and intelligence that determined that racial hederitarianism is fringe. I would like to ask you, independent of a vote among established Wikipedia editors, what kind of evidence, if you could imagine it, would persuade you that racial hederitarianism is not fringe, is that even a possibility? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:C180:1980:998A:2971:EF34:F150 (talk) 17:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- As the closer, I summarized the consensus. I don't think discussing things you need to show me to convince me of something has any impact on Wikipedia policy. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Technical news
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
Arbitration
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
Tesla Master Plan
Saw that you deleted this. I was the author this time. I put comments on the talk page, but the deletion occurred without any response. Specifically I didn't repost the deleted article (I was unaware one had been written, much less deleted). I wrote from scratch, with an emphasis on aspects that were not considered in the delete discussion. Thanks. Lfstevens (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Lfstevens, it was recently deleted at AfD. While there were differences in the article and the AfD had some other concerns, there was an overall consensus at the AfD that a business plan is not notable. I don't think it is within the intent of the policy that we should have two AfDs within a month to determine the same policy point, even if there are differences in the specific wording/sourcing. If you want others to review it, you can contest at WP:DRV. Please just let me know if you decide to go that route. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- It seems that if two editors independently thought it was worth an article that should count for something. However, I won't contest. My sense is that the original (basically unanimous) decision to delete was a reflection of the Tesla hate going around, and I don't have the army of supporters that it would take to overcome them. I'll add something to the main Tesla article. Thanks for responding. Lfstevens (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for the initial delay in response. Had been traveling the earlier part of the week without access to my computer. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- It seems that if two editors independently thought it was worth an article that should count for something. However, I won't contest. My sense is that the original (basically unanimous) decision to delete was a reflection of the Tesla hate going around, and I don't have the army of supporters that it would take to overcome them. I'll add something to the main Tesla article. Thanks for responding. Lfstevens (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Was there any offensive content in the April Fools' AfD that you deleted? I am an apolitical April Fools' participant, but unless there was offensive, potentially G10-worthy content over at the AfD, I believe that "[t]his is just a bad idea" sounds too much like IDONTLIKEIT for a supposedly-"uncontroversial" G6. How about we send it to DRV first to see what others think? Thank you for your attention. Not·Really·Soroka 04:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Having seen this on my watchlist, I strongly endorse the deletion. Newyorkbrad (talk) 04:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Newyorkbrad May I ask whether there was a content-related rationale behind your endorsement? NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- I would have hoped that a reference to common sense would be sufficient. Newyorkbrad (talk) 04:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Newyorkbrad May I ask whether there was a content-related rationale behind your endorsement? NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- NotReallySoroka, a tip: when the community turns a blind eye to you vandalising Wikipedia on 1st April, the implicit bargain is that you don't then make life more difficult for those who have to clean up after you. By wasting time objecting to the deletion of pages that clearly have no encyclopaedic value, for example. – Joe (talk) 04:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Joe Roe I believe that it is a false equivalent to tie every April Fools' prank to vandalism. NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- April 1 is over. This is an encyclopedia. Please do not waste any further time. Johnuniq (talk) 04:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- NotReallySoroka, traditionally the way April Fools Day works is that if there's a reasonable objection to a joke, the joke is either rolled back or deleted. Someone nominated that article as G4. It was different than the one deleted a few years ago, obviously, but the underlying concerns are the same: it was created surrounding his indictment and people were already making jokes that could be inflammatory. Not to mention that keeping it would call into question the project's commitment towards neutral point of view toward living people (i.e. if a similar AfD had been made about Biden and had commented on his mental state or his son's legal matters, we would have deleted in a heartbeat.)But even ignoring all of that - IDONTLIKEIT is a perfectly valid speedy deletion rationale for an prank April Fools Day AfD about arguably the most famous living person on the planet, and arguably any living person. So no, I'm not undeleting it. If you wish to further disrupt the project past April 1st, feel free to take it to DRV. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- I fully agree with Tony except in one respect: please don't feel free to take it to DRV; just drop it. Thanks, Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Neutrally mentioning that there appears to be an AfD related to the topic of AfDs on BLPs caused by this year's April Fools: Wikipedia_talk:April_Fools#RfC:_Ban_joke_AfD_of_living_people. Since this thread on my talk page has seen commentary on the topic, mentioning it to stalkers. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
Arbitration
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
Miscellaneous
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
Misfiled at SPI
Hi Tony, I'm only messaging you because I saw you were active. I made a mistake with an autofiling. I had meant to submit a filing for DJdjPollard15 (the target filing) but I accidentally filed it under DjdjPollard15 (my filing). Can the two be merged into the correct ones please? Sorry about that! The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 07:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
Technical news
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
Miscellaneous
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
Self-requested block until September 15, 2023 for User:CodemWiki
Hello, I have read here that you are one of the only administrators willing to block users on demand.
I am an 18 years old student and failed my exams because of a lack of planning, discipline and a rampant Wikipedia addiction. It would significantly improve my odds at becoming happy and disciplined if I was blocked from editing this website for the next few months.
I absolutely love building this encyclopedia and will probably reasonably do so throughout this century if I don't die young, but at this specific point in my life (these few decisive years) it causes me harm. I have tried browser extensions that block a website for a certain period of time, but i didn't work. On the contrary, my addiction has become worse. I am doomed to depressively read Reuters articles and academic papers all day and add all the knowledge they contain to the respective Wikipedia articles with links and citations in the appropriate sections if nothing is done.
I am not even supposed to use English so much where I live, the competences I am exercising here are not required for what I do in real life. My non-English speaking friends are much happier and skilled than me.
Please, block me from editing until September 15, 2023. I have read your conditions. At the end of my block, I would prefer to keep my "extended user" confirmation as I foresee needing it in 10 or 15 years. I sincerely apologize if your talk page was not the appropriate place for this request, and in that case redirect me to the correct talk page.
Thank you for offering help. CodemWiki (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)