Tonyf23ton
April 2009
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Mountain House, California has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. UIS Editor Review 21:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
I moved the Mountain House page back to Mountain House, California. Why? Here's my "why move this page" statement:
Mountain House is a place in existence today. It has houses, people, and things. It is not a "future community." Wikipedia does not talk about the "future," as what's in the future does not exist today. A major plan, something like legislation, that would affect the future may be notable enough to have a WP page. Community development plans are not notable in that way. Thousands of communities all over the place have such plans. They are usually not notable. And Mountain House's is only notable in the context of the "Mountain House, California" page that already exists. And even then, the Mountain House plan should not be treated as the "future," because the plan could change. It would suffice perfectly well to say that the plan calls for X number of houses, Y acres of commercial development, Z this and that, and spend a paragraph or two on the plan. Beyond that, the article needs to stay limited to a description of what is there right now and its history, and completely omit all this future nonsense that hasn't come true yet. This is to say nothing of the flagrant advertisement-like tone of much of the writing that's been appearing on this page. See WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:NOTADVERTISING -- this page is here neither for peering into the future nor for advertising this lovely place called Mountain House.
So, please, don't move the page, and leave out the future-prediction and advertising tone. Please also see WP:USCITY. Michael Patrick (talk) 18:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
James Logan High School
editI removed the school hours you posted on James Logan High School. Please read WP:WPSCH/AG for the rationale- basically, Wikipedia isn't here to show ALL information about a given school- the school's website is a great location for that level of detail. Cheers, tedder (talk) 18:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of New Haven Adult school, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.nhusd.k12.ca.us/adult/aboutus.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
You left a message on the page for Emeryville Center of Community Life asking how to improve the article. The most important thing you have to do is to show how the project is notable by Wikipedia's criteria. You have to add references from independent sources, such as newspapers, etc., that talk about the project. Right now the only sources are from websites related to the project itself (the city, the school district, the architects), and that only shows that it exists, not that it's notable. ... discospinster talk 23:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
When you edit the above article, I'm sure we would all appreciate your awareness that just about everything in it is merely a proposal and may not even be approved by the Regional Planning Commission. To remind all editors, I have added a WP:Crystal tag, which really should be retained until the faults in the article (as suggested in the WP:Crystal advice page) have been corrected. Sincerely yours, and with a great deal of thanks for working on this article, I am, GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent edits
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to TNA Impact Zone, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. iCEMAN247 20:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
[[User:Iceman247| sorry about that didnt know still new here (Tonyf23ton (talk) 01:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)).
File permission problem with File:Coyote springs sign 10.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Coyote springs sign 10.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 19:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:CoyoteSpringsJuly302007026.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:CoyoteSpringsJuly302007026.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 19:53, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:New set.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:New set.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sonoma Mountain Village in Rohnert Park
edit A tag has been placed on Sonoma Mountain Village in Rohnert Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
editRecommend you read WP:FIRST. If you still have questions, click on the Help button to the left of your screen and navigate yourself to the help desk. You could type:
- {{helpme}}
on your talkpage but whoever shows up will probably refer you the same way as me. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:29, 26 May 2010 (UTC)/
moreno oso i did read WP:FIRST but i still have questions and need help on sun valley communities wikki (Tonyf23ton (talk) 20:42, 26 May 2010 (UTC)).
June 2010
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Bakersfield, California, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Manway (talk) 00:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Manway thank you i try to do that im sorry a about that (Tonyf23ton (talk) 00:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)).
Blocked editor
editAs you are well aware, several of your sockpuppet accounts were recently blocked for disruptive behaviour. Please stop replacing sourced information with unsourced or improperly sourced claims. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Keepcalmandcarryon|Keepcalmandcarryon]] i had sourced information so you cant tell me stop . (Tonyf23ton (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)).
The article Sun Valley Communities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Community was never built and gets no Google hits
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Diannaa (Talk) 03:14, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)