Totallycrazyman

Welcome!

Hello Totallycrazyman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 22:23, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Totallycrazyman! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 688 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Adam Deacon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

New College Humanities

Hello Totallycrazyman! I'm collecting information for a 'criticism' sub-section for the New College Humanities page as it is proving to be a heavily contentious and discussed issue in the media and elsewhere at the moment to the extent that it is reasonable to have a sub-section on the wiki. I am a wiki-novice and could use some help collating all the information I've seen on the news and blogosphere. You only have to type Grayling into google news to get enough stuff for a large crit section, but here is some of the most apt sources I've found so far:

- http://studenttheory.wordpress.com/2011/06/06/new-college-for-the-humanities-emperor’s-new-clothes/ (this is just a simple summary of the key viewpoints, for example, how different this collage is to Ivy league ones (which as that seems to be a main selling point of the university might be important))
- http://anticuts.com/2011/06/05/the-new-privatised-order-18k-and-a-lecture-from-niall-ferguson/ (here is an exchange of emails between Grayling and Sean Rizzo (the head of Birkbeck Student Union) in which the main objections and Grayling's responses to them are outlined)
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/06/ac-graylings-new-private-univerity-is-odious (Terry Eagleton's curt response to the collage)
- http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/79981,people,news,ac-grayling-new-college-of-humanities-hit-by-plagiarism-row-nch-richard-dawkins (here is stuff about them plagiarizing Birkbeck and Holloway)
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/jun/06/ac-grayling-private-university-syllabus (here is another article on the Guardian saying the same thing)
- http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/indialenon/100090894/three-reasons-why-the-new-college-of-the-humanities-will-fail/ (here is a right wing criticism of the university)
- http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-a-private-sector-oxbridge-not-exactly-2293915.html (here is a piece on how this new collage is not like Oxbridge)
- http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=416405&c=1 (here are some good quotes from right winger Blackstone who is against the collage)
- http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=416405&c=1 (here is an interview between Grayling and Blackstone)
- http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/cristinaodone/100090770/the-university-of-big-hair-and-big-heads/ (another right winger attacking the curriculum for being too ideological)
- http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=416422 (a piece by someone who had a course of theirs plagiarized by the collage (good quote "Students at the New College of the Humanities will take the University of London External BA exams, so for English literature they’ll get the teaching materials written in the 1990s at Goldsmiths. Apparently my fresh-from-a-BA reflections on early modern drama strike the New College professoriate as suitable promotional material for their £18,000-a-year degree.")

Anyway, I hope that's not too much to dump. It is just stuff I am trying to organize so I thought I'd share with a fellow wiki-er who might be doing the same thing.

Best - Heathcoteheat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathcoteheat (talk • contribs) 11:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Dear Totallycrazyman, I noticed your little modification to this article: The announcement attracted a substantial response in the UK, and a significant amount of adverse publicity, where most higher education institutions are publicly funded. I was wondering if you could have another look. I feel the last bit (where most of the ..) reads a little strangely. (This was true, but in my view a little less true, in the earlier version The announcement attracted a substantial and mixed response in the UK, where most higher education institutions are publicly funded.) I read and "mixed response" as implying critical but... Anyway feel free to ignore this - I am just a bit worried that this addition will lead to another mass revert. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC))

File permission problem with File:G427257.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:G427257.jpg, which you've sourced to Photo taken by an independent photographer. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:15, 24 November 2011 (UTC)