August 2012

edit

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 08:42, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah

edit

I hate to break it to you, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. That means we only have articles about things that are important, famous or notable. You are none of those things. Thanks to your confession on my talkpage, I am now going to have this account blocked. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 08:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply


my page is speedily deleted all the time , I am Hoszia Hinds, and I used my official pictures and i kept getting a message talking about copyright infringement, but I own the pictures also my articles are mines and I used parts of my biography and it was also rejected, I need my page active, I am a artiste and I need this rectified please this is what i wrote what confession are you speaking about


well he just signed a record deal with a Major Canadian Labeland he does have a track record as an independent artiste, I've seen this on several of your pages already with a lot of new signed artiste

For some reason you seem to think that you can use Wikipedia for free promotion. Your topic is not notable. He is not famous, and does not deserve an article. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 09:08, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 5 August 2012

(UTC)

well do what u want I will remember this and save it for the future, and you really need to work on how you comment and treat people, what promotions, I don't need to do that, I see most artiste are already in Wikipedia famous are not, a lot of people do research the artiste and therefore I was using it to create a History write on the artiste, you should never judge everyone the same, that was merely what I was using the encyclopedia so that his information would be credited and people would have a write up on his history when they do research, I thought that was what this encyclopedia is for. You really need to be more thoughtful in your responses, not everyone one is using it for promotions, the label already is paying for that. It was merely to define his history background, which should never be a problem, it suppose to be a free encyclopedia to the public. thank you

Not every one is using it for promotion, but you are. This is what we call notable, this is what we are not. Please read these, and try to learn why you are in the wrong, and why your article is not suitable. I am very surprised that your block is so short, given than you have stated you have no intention of doing anything other than promoting a non notable person. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 09:46, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Now I am blocked after this message, which I did not delete any of those notification here after, and the content was merely a true biography of the individual artiste, there was not untruth, I see other artiste use their biographies in wikipedia

Once again, please read this and this to know why your article was deleted, and why it will be deleted again if you recreate it. It's really not very hard to understand now is it? Iamthemuffinman (talk) 10:04, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply