User talk:Trb9/sandbox

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cpm827

I like the choice of adding a "Clinical significance" section, and I think you did a great job on writing the contents. My only suggestion that you could break it up further into sections and give each section a title. So a section can be choroideremia, another can be mental retardation... and so on. Rpc91 (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Very well done on the citation. I, like Rpc91, enjoyed reading about clinical applications. I plan on doing a bit of reading of my own before commenting on the content of the article. There was one sentence* that I found to be a bit wordy and had to do a double take. You need not change it. It is actually clear enough. I just thought you should know it tripped me up. In all fairness, I was learning most of this as I went so that may have been a part of it. Wiki readers tend to do that a lot however.

  • "Mutations in the GDI1 gene have been shown to lead to X-linked nonspecific mental retardation, and in a study done on mice, carriers for a deletion of the GDI1 gene have shown marked abnormalities in short-term memory formation and social interaction patterns."

Cpm827 (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply