User talk:Treaty07
Add topicMirrors
[edit]
Thanks for contributing to the article Gideon Ebijitimi. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:41, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2026 (UTC) |
Unblock Request
[edit]
Treaty07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I believe I was blocked in error for sock puppetry.
I am a new editor and this is my only account. I have not created or used any other accounts on English Wikipedia. I do not know User:Ngozi16 and not affiliated to them. If my editing pattern looked similar, it was unintentional and I am willing to learn and follow all policies. I have also taken time to learn about Mirrors, and still learning more about reliable sources and notability.
I ask an admin to review the evidence and my edits. I’m committed to contributing constructively and will avoid anything that could be mistaken for policy violations in the future.
Thank you for reviewing this. Treaty07 (talk) 18:19, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I've reviewed the evidence, and I believe the block is correct. Not only that, it's kinda bizarre and insulting to our intelligence that you would even attempt to claim otherwise. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.