Treichar

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Hello, Treichar, and Welcome to Wikipedia! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — w.carter-Talk 00:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philonome clemensella has been accepted

Philonome clemensella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Philonome clemensella) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Philonome clemensella, Treichar!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article is a good start but please note that sites like BugGuide are, like Wikipedia, user-generated sites not subject to peer review or other quality control. More reliable sources would be books and scientific literature. Cheers.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hypsoropha hormos has been accepted

Hypsoropha hormos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Treichar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Treichar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hypsoropha monilis has been accepted

Hypsoropha monilis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rankersbo (talk) 06:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Callizzia amorata has been accepted

Callizzia amorata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker^talk 15:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Note that on the English Wikipedia we generally title articles by the more common name for a subject, if Gray Scoopwing Moth is more commonly used than the species name, we can move the title. In either case, we can have a redirect from one title insure that someone looking for it under either name will successfully find the article, just let me know. Thanks for your contributions! --j⚛e decker^talk 16:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Celastrina idella

added a link pointing to Black Cherry

Philonome clemensella

added a link pointing to Costa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyromorpha dimidiata has been accepted

Pyromorpha dimidiata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC).
15:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Great work

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Great work on moths! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC).

Second that. Awesome work! And I am very glad you are picking up Noctoid taxonomy, since I had a really hard time wrapping my head around it. Ruigeroeland (talk) 07:39, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. It's starting to look archaic to see litter moths, tiger moths, etc. still in Noctuidae in Wikipedia now that they have a new family home, even if some of the other Erebidae groups haven't stabilized within the family yet. Two wishes (to make updating the taxonomy easier) would be to have access to a few more journals (e.g., in Systematic Entomology) and the ability to edit the same content in multiple related articles at once (e.g., "is a species of moth of the Noctuidae family" --> "is a species of moth of the Erebidae family" in the species pages intros). There are thousands of genus and species pages to update. Any suggestions?

One suggestion I have for the Wikipedia Lepidoptera project as a whole is to encourage any new or updated pages to use the automatic taxoboxes and consider the manual ones deprecated. The future time savings of this would be immense. Treichar (talk) 16:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

BrevisTemplate:Taxonomy/Brevis

Please be careful to create templates in the "Template:" namespace. I've moved your page to Template:Taxonomy/Brevis. The original page will be removed from article space. —Swpb^talk 20:21, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for catching the mispasting. Treichar (talk) 20:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nygmiini

added links pointing to Medama and Arna

Baniana minor

added a link pointing to Guanacaste

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arctiini (erebid moths)

added a link pointing to Tiger moth

Euchromiina

added a link pointing to Tiger moth

Incertae sedis (Arctiini)

added a link pointing to Tiger moth

Incertae sedis (Lithosiini)

added a link pointing to Panachranta

Pericopina

added a link pointing to Tiger moth

Phaegopterina

added a link pointing to Tiger moth

Scoliopteryx

added a link pointing to The Herald

Spilosomina

added a link pointing to Tiger moth

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Callizzia has been accepted

Callizzia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

Hello Treichar,

I am conducting research about newcomers to Wikipedia and I was hoping to ask you some questions. I’ve noticed you’ve had some good activity recently. Is there any chance you have time in the next month to speak with me? If you are interested or have any questions, please email me at gmugar [at] syr.edu or leave a message on my talk page.

I hope to be in touch soon,

Gabrielm199 (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Erebidae: Pericopina

Hello Treichar, thanks again for the great work you are doing with regard to Erebidae taxonomy. I wanted to help out earlier, but did not have the stomach for it. :) Anyway, I chipped in now and reclassified all articles in the Pericopina subtribe, so you can cross those of your list (if you have one). Cheers! Ruigeroeland (talk) 16:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Great! The family is so big that help is needed. I am working through the last subfamily (Erebinae) and its tribes right now. Once that is done, I think I will have all reasonably defined subfamily, tribe, and subtribe pages in place with most genera updated and assigned to them, and I will then rewrite and expand the Erebidae page. There are two main activities left in laying out the taxonomy across all the pages in Erebidae: 1. I don't know where some of the genera belong. In some cases, I am not sure if they belong in Noctuidae or Erebidae. These genera and species pages have not been updated. 2. I have skipped updating most species pages in the erebid genera due to the sheer number, especially genera with more than 2 existing species pages. So those are two good places where help is still needed. I strongly recommend switching manual taxoboxes to automatic ones wherever a manual taxobox needs to be updated (with species pages using the Speciesbox). The Noctuoidea taxonomy will surely change again, and this switch will significantly reduce the amount of work in the future without adding much right now. Treichar (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Regarding 1.: yeah, that might be troublesome until an outline of the family is published somewhere. Regarding 2.: I will help with that from time to time. I have no experience with the automatic taxobox, but I will give it a try when I tackle another tribe/subfamily. Good thing is that you have made a great basic structure to work from when updating all the species pages. There are indeed very many, but we'll get it done. I will ask Wilhelmina Will to chip in too. She is helping out with article creation at the moment, but I guess she would be willing to step in also. Cheers and keep up the great work! Ruigeroeland (talk) 07:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

FYI: Audeini and Catocalini are also done. Cheers! Ruigeroeland (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

The last tribe articles of Erebinae are completed, and I expanded the Erebidae page. There are a bunch of genera in the Arctiinae that I will update next. Then I'll revisit the subfamily and tribe pages and focus on topics other than taxonomy. If you need any help with the automatic taxoboxes, let me know. In practice, there are 4 cases to learn, and they are easy:

1. Genus or higher, article title matches taxon name, e.g., Erebidae. Use automatic taxobox template with authority field. Taxon field not needed.
2. Genus or higher, article title does not match taxon name, e.g., Achaea (moth) for Achaea. Also add the taxon field: "|taxon = Achaea" without "(moth)". The corresponding taxonomy template name lacks the "(moth)" but the link field there should look like: "|link=Achaea (moth)|Achaea".
3. Monotypic genus article doubling as a species page, e.g., Micrarctia. Use Speciesbox template. Set taxon to the binomial without quotes or brackets. Fill in authority with the binomial's author, and fill in the parent_authority with the genus's author. Note that the manual taxobox uses genus_authority but the automatic taxobox uses parent_authority.
4. Species article, e.g., Ascalapha odorata. Use Speciesbox with the authority field. Taxon field not needed.

And in all these cases, you can also add the image, image2, synonyms fields, which are the same as in manual taxoboxes. Treichar (talk) 05:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Help me!

I cited a journal article by Reza Zahiri on several dozen relevant articles like Homocerynea. Then I noticed that the citation had a typo. The name is misspelled as Reze instead of Reza. Is there a fast way to fix all those typos at once?

Treichar (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

The only way to fix it will be to replace it in each article you added the reference to.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

If you had a full list of articles it might be possible to use a semi-automated tool such as AutoWikiBrowser, but it's probably easier to do it manually. Huon (talk) 16:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

All fixed: [1] Huon (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erebidae, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Medial and Cubital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 24 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Gondysia page, your edit caused a DOI error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)