User talk:Trevjpublic redirects here.
This page was last edited by The Herald (talk | contribs) 3 months ago. (Update timer)

Cet utilisateur est prêt à être contacté en  français. Traductions tentatives seront ajoutées. (Attempted translations will be appended.)

Re. your edits to Heroine of Hackney in 2011

edit

Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 June 17, Pauline Pearce. Matt 190417 (talk) 11:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for letting me know. What a blast from the past! -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 23:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bristol meetup

edit

You have previously attended or expressed an interest in attending a meetup in Bristol. I am organising one for this summer - provisionally Saturday 1 September 2018. For details see m:Meetup/Bristol/3 to join the discussion, including expressing preferences about dates and venues, see the talk page at m:Talk:Meetup/Bristol/3. Thryduulf (talk) 18:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Maybe next time. I've replied there. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 23:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Trevj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

An association for Mesopedians

edit

Hi greetings, I created an Wikipedian association named m:Association of Mesopedianist Wikipedians for mesopedians. Would you mind joining in it? Regards.--PATH SLOPU (Talk) 14:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please participate to the talk pages consultation

edit

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse Hosts

edit
 

Hello. Over at the Teahouse we're having a bit of a 'spring clean' by removing inactive entries from the list of Hosts that new users see. As you don't appear to be very active these days, your 'host profile' has been removed from the list. But please don't let that put you off contributing again in the future - either by signing back up as a Host to assist on regular basis, or simply dropping in whenever you fancy helping out.

Thank you for all your past help and support for new users at the Teahouse. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC) "Reply

June 2019

edit

 Hello, Trevj, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:Trevj/The Chessels. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). There may be content that can be merged into the mainspace page The Chessels. GretLomborg (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Coffee table books has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Coffee table books, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Who's Lobbying

edit
 

Hello, Trevj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Who's Lobbying.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:14, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day!

edit

Happy First Edit Day!

edit
  Hey, Trevj. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 

Proposed deletion of File:Mr Leon's Paris Sacre-Coeur.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Mr Leon's Paris Sacre-Coeur.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article already contains another non-free file to depict the work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Isabelle 🔔 22:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Wikipedia:NS1" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:NS1. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#Wikipedia:NS1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Riscos.info

edit
 

The article Riscos.info has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails Wikipedia:GNG and citations are mainly about RISC OS itself, not riscos.info

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have been pruned from a list

edit

Hi Trevj! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Music Box (software) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Music Box (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music Box (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PMC(talk) 00:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Go-Op

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Go-Op requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JuniperChill (talk) 23:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day!

edit