Trichydaa

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Madurai Airport has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Madurai Airport was changed by Trichydaa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863332 on 2017-06-30T13:30:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Trichydaa, you are invited to try Wikipedia training modules

If you're looking for some guidance on how to get started, try these training modules. basic rules how to edit evaluating articles adding images citing sources copyright rules about these trainings We're trying to improve our tools for helping new editors get started. These trainings are hosted on the "Programs & Events Dashboard", a tool for helping Wikipedia editors organize editing events. You can optionally log in using your Wikipedia account to keep track of which trainings you've completed. If you have feedback, we'd love to hear it!

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 20:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tiruchirappalli. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tiruchirappalli was changed by Trichydaa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955651 on 2017-07-01T14:24:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello, I'm Vensatry. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tiruchirappalli, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Vensatry _(talk) 15:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tiruchirappalli shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Vensatry _(talk) 15:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Trichydaa reported by User:Vensatry (Result: ). Thank you. —Vensatry _(talk) 15:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Being a "National level" college doesn't matter. This is nowhere in the league of NIT and IIM. Besides, the article is an WP:FAC - that you need to gain Wikipedia:Consensus before making any changes. —Vensatry _(talk) 15:53, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Trichydaa, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Trichydaa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Separate Statistics Column

Hi there, As mentioned in the edit summary of the the page Tiruchirappalli International Airport, kindly discuss regarding adding statistics as a separate column where the current one is already mentioned in the info box. Thanks in advance. Amdmustafa (talk) 06:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Trichydaa reported by User:Amdmustafa (Result: ). Thank you. Amdmustafa (talk) 08:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Your recent editing history at Tiruchirappalli International Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Vensatry _(talk) 13:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Tiruchirappalli

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)