Nothing

edit
 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Trickster206 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
65.94.241.216 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Trickster2062nd". The reason given for Trickster2062nd's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: using multiple accounts (see [[U


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  Netsnipe  ►  12:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Here

edit

Here

edit
 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Block of Because I didnt do anything what did I do to upset you ???????? :( lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Trickster206 (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Trickster206 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
Because I didnt do anything what did I do to upset you ???????? :( (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: reason — Trickster206 (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Trickster206 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
Because I didnt do anything what did I do to upset you ???????? :( (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Trickster206 (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)NihonhoeReply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trickster206 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Because I didnt do anything what did I do to upset you ???????? :(

Decline reason:

You do not seriously expect us to believe that you and Trickster2062nd are different people, do you? And if there was any remote chance of an unblock, your posting of a spurious unblock acceptance would have eliminated it. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 20:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

fuck you im never editing again ! cant we all just get along ?Trickster206 (talk) trickter Holla —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.68.144 (talk) 22:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply