Trigor

Welcome

Hi Trigor, welcome to Wikipedia! :)

I, što se tiče uređivanja stranice DS, nema na čemu :) --Joy [shallot] 09:23, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Ceda Jovanovic

Please take a look at that paragraph at Cedomir Jovanovic. I modified it to make it clear that he was only accused of being part of mafia. I am not sure what did you think was POV about it. The contacts were confirmed by Ceda himself, but actual involvement was denied. --Dejan Cabrilo 16:18, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Nuclear "phase-out"

President of Philippines is lady so you should change "his" and "he" accordingly.

--Trigor 13:22, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. **blushing** Corrected. Ben ^T/_C 13:53, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

It is still the same. You corrected it but than somehow the old version returned. --Trigor

Corrected again. I don't understand what happened. Thanks for checking and telling me. Ben ^T/_C 23:59, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

Nuclear power phase-out

Why do yoy propose these countries? They are not even considering nuclear phase out. --Trigor 08:47, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your question. Answered at Talk:nuclear power phase-out. Ben ^T/_C 08:54, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

I noticed you copied material from nuclear power phase-out to nuclear energy policy. That runs just opposite to what I was trying to do. While you might have tried to introduce more NPOV into the article, you created more redundancy with the nuclear power phase-out article. I think, though now it might not look like, both topics are distinct and have different foci. Therefore we should try to keep them a little apart and not copy material. As for the nuclear energy policy, it should mention phase-outs but that's not the focus, it only summarizes material from nuclear power phase-out, that's what links are for. --Ben ^T/_C 02:02, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you for your comment about Nuclear "phase out" copying to nuclear energy policy. First of all I would like to explain myself. All in all two paragraphs have been copied to nuclear policy article. One is part about Netherlands. I copied it because old one was just an old version of nuclear phase out paragraph that I updated and moved to policy page. I do believe that that article is good for energy policy. I think that that one is an exception. For example it would be wrong to move Sweden as article on policy page deals with several aspects. Not just phase out. I felt that Netherlands paragraph could be moved there.

Second one was about nuclear security. Security standard. Again it was copy of old version from nuclear phase out or vice versa. That one can apply to both articles. In other words arguments against phase out and for nuclear are more the less the same. Same goes for vice versa. That is not truth however for other parts of the article.

--Trigor 11:51, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I see your changes make sense.

I am under pressure of people who want to merge and split the two articles all the time so I am very cautious to keep them apart a little, though they have to be written more or less in parallel, with different foci - not an easy task. My idea was to have all the info first in nuclear power phase-out and then move relevant parts to nuclear energy policy and summarize them in nuclear power phase-out. Ben ^T/_C 05:10, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

sr Wikipedia

Pozivam te da sudeluješ u radu na Wikipediji na srpskom jeziku! --M. Pokrajac 00:19, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Kako mogu da pomognem--Trigor 08:36, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Links about human rights abuse during Sablja

Dodao sam linkove sa HRW-a, kao sto cu dodati uskoro sa AI-a. Imas ovaj odgovor i na mojoj strani za razgovor na engleskom. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 11:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Nuclear energy policy

Sorry for the late response to your post on the talk page of Nuclear energy policy. It must have slipped through my "scanners," I am very sorry. I will try to integrate your contribution as fast as possible. BTW, maybe there will be a lot of changes to both nuclear energy policy and nuclear power phase-out. We are just discussing changes on Talk:Nuclear power phase-out, your opinion is very welcome, since you are one of the best contributors. Ben ^T/_C 03:06, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Čedomir Jovanović

Hi! I have no idea whether Čedomir Jovanović is Roma or not - I was simply rewording some edits made by User:Desiphral and User:Bg007, who added the information about Jovanovic's Roma ethnicity - see this diff. I think you should ask Bg007 where he got the source about Jovanović's Roma origin. Thanks, Ronline ✉ 06:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Hi,byUser:Bg007,answer is very simple.He has never said that he is Rom or Serb,but if he's parents are Rom,so and he is.It is so obvious .Thierry Henry is French,but it is ovious that he is black.That is common situacion within Roma people,when sucseed in life ,they usually forget your origin.

Your recent edits

Please, consult the talkpage before making revisions like these. --Camptown (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)