Triplehuman

Disclaimer: Hi - I am the person described on the Julie Freeman page. I have updated it with factual information. Hope this is OK.

In response to your feedback

Hey there. Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your feedback. Happy editing!! Cheers!! :)

Roshan220195 (talk) 13:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Welcome!

Hello, Misslake, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Roshan220195 (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

CS1 error on Jessica Green (academic)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jessica Green (academic), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Sources please

Please remember to add sources for everything you add to Wikipedia, but most especially for information about living people. In your edits to Karen McCarthy Woolf you didn't source her FRSL (or even mention it in the body of the text), didn't source her work at Goldsmiths (I can't find a source which gives her the title "Associate Lecturer", though I've sourced that she teaches there), and removed the sourced "poet-in-residence" to say "Writer", for some reason. Please add sources, and respect existing sources. I've sorted out this lot, though can't find any mention of that "Associate Lecturer" title. Thanks. PamD 13:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello - many thanks for sorting the citations. I will do better next time! Triplehuman (talk) 17:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Safwat Saleem (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Safwat Saleem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Triplehuman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, Triplehuman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Safwat Saleem, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello Saqib,

My connection with Safwat Saleem is through the TED fellows network, and other art associations. There is no personal relationship - I didn't feel it a conflict of interest. I am starting to add and update TED fellows on wikipedia as a personal project, but it's not easy it seems! 62.49.248.77 (talk) 10:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

The issue here isn't a COI, but rather that the subject, in this case Safwat Saleem, fails to meet WP:N. And when the editor continues to push for articles on non-notable subjects, it becomes problematic. I would suggest setting this topic aside for now and focusing on other, more notable subjects. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Saqib, I'm not being problematic, I'm trying to understand the process and highlighting that the artwork the subject creates is notable in the art world, as verified by valid sources like the BBC and recognition such as awards from TED and AAPI. In Pheonix (pop 1.6 million) he is well known and respected, and his global reputation is growing (almost 2 million views on a single video). He is not an MP or Policy Maker but a significant artist. 62.49.248.77 (talk) 10:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)