Trishamalford

I understand that I am new to Wikipedia, but I assure you that I am trustworthy; which is why I am requesting adminship so that I can contribute to the community. I have the ethical attributes that would allow me to be an asset to the administrative team here at Wikipedia. I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies and guidelines so that I can become well aware of the expectations. Could you help me? Trishamalford (talk) 17:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Moneybagg Yo have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 15:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

I apologize for that error. Thank you for targeting and correcting my mistake. I appreciate you giving me an explanation on my error. I will be sure to enhance my editing skills and adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines Trishamalford (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 21:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

I do apologize. I did not know that it was considered "vandalism" or "disruptive editing" if you are adding information about the partner who is attached to the subject. I will be sure to let an administrator add any information from here on out. I assure you that you do not have to block me from Wikipedia because I was not intending to promote a person I have no relations to. Trishamalford (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

The Real Poison Ivy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Real Poison Ivy. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 06:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trishamalford (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Spam edits were not done from this accountTrishamalford (talk) 08:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are clearly here to promote two rappers; the block is correct. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #69934

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Unblocking inquiry

• The Real Poison Ivy · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Protected attribute —Trishamalford (talk) 03:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC) Trishamalford (talk) 03:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)