TriskySeskel

Welcome!

Hi TriskySeskel! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 01:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

as you find your way around

In your user preferences - there are some inneresting things in

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Twinkle/Preferences might be of interest as well, twinkle complements redwarn, in a manner of speaking... JarrahTree 01:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Jackson Pollock

Exactly what is the problem you have with the Jackson Pollock edit? The Massachusetts Airman is called "jackthedripper" and Pollock is called "Jack the Dripper", clearly a hatnote is needed. -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 17:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Use a reliable source. TriskySeskel (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

That is a WP:HATNOTE -- hatnotes do not carry references, they are for disambiguation between different articlees. The reference to the terms used in the hatnote are in the destination article. You should familiarize yourself with the function of hatnotes, since you seem to be a new user. -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Image Stabilization Reverts

What exactly is your issue? The text before my edits is poorly written with the topic jumping around from sentence to sentence. I moved sentences on the same topic next to each other and clarified the (wrong) implications of the disadvantages of sensor stabilization as they apply to mirror-less cameras. So, before reverting, perhaps talk with the author of edits. 24.161.76.18 (talk) 16:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Momfluencer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Momfluencer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Momfluencer has been accepted

Momfluencer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 19:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)