Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Tsadaqbmein, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — ξxplicit 22:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elisssaaaaaaa3.0.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Elisssaaaaaaa3.0.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alan - talk 02:07, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elisssssaaaaaa2.0.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Elisssssaaaaaa2.0.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alan - talk 02:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elissssaaaa.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Elissssaaaa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alan - talk 02:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to LoveGame. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

As a follow-up to this concern, the more important information to take from this is what is considered to be a reliable source. For example, Amazon.com is not a valid source, and is also not generally considered a valid external link either. Wikipedia can only include information from sources that the community deems reliable - linking to other sites may be considered to be promotional and therefore may be reverted on sight. Feel free to contact me if you have questions. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reported

edit

You have been reported at WP:ANI for continued adding of unreliable sources to some of the music related articles. You may present your thoughts and case at this thread where your case rests. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elissssaaaa.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Elissssaaaa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alan - talk 04:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elisssssaaaaaa2.0.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Elisssssaaaaaa2.0.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alan - talk 04:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elisssaaaaaaa3.0.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Elisssaaaaaaa3.0.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alan - talk 04:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Newbupp.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Newbupp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alan - talk 04:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009

edit
okay i'm sorry, my mistake :( they WERE all correct, somebody must've changed them before you fixed them. was also in a bad mood :( but, off-topic, that was a very random thing to say :p Mister sparky (talk) 17:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

NW (Talk) 00:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of I Live for the Day

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is I Live for the Day. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Live for the Day. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Elissa - Ahla Donya album cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Elissa - Ahla Donya album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Elissa - Bastanak.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Elissa - Bastanak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply