User talk:Ttayloranne/sandbox

Taylor,

In the broad scope you are on track for creating a successful wikipedia page. You have multiple sources for each article, and you use Proquest and other databases as credible sources.

I like how you plan to create a page for "It's On Us" and have set goals for the project. There is a page, "White House Task Force on Sexual Assault" but it does not cover the implications of the social movement. With the goals, you also highlight celebrities that are involved in the movement. Going into the vast amount of partners, beyond the White House employees would be a good way of attacking it. Also, contributing statistics on sexual assaults on college campuses would be a good information bit to add into the introduction of the article.

Abortion Rights Movements, particularly in Poland and other areas is also a great article for Human Rights. Talking about current law, past law, and the clash of law and catholicism would be a great addition the article. There is a specific article called Abortion In Poland, but it lacks detail regarding the recent Black Monday protests. With the history that you describe in your additions, I would move towards more recent news, since the history is already well documented.

Girls Who Code is a great article to contribute to. The wikipedia article is a small stub and could use much more infomation. Since coding programs are increasing every month, the industry is dynamic and has a lot of information. Your plan on expanding Reshma Saujani's ideology will be perfect, since there is not much on the page(or her personal page) about her and her coding influence. Also using statistics, like showing the gender gap and the significant male dominance within computer industry will help provide more context into Saujani's argument.

Overall, I think you are off to a great start, with many sources and a good outline of what you want to attack. Jacobmolga (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

P.S. - You spelled Barack wrong in your first sentence for Its On US. =)