TubeYouTokTik

Talk?

TubeYouTokTik, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TubeYouTokTik! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Also please read wp:brd, you have been reverted, you need to make a case at the talk page.Slatersteven (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

At this stage I would also advise you top read wp:spa and wp:tenditious. Right now I suspect you are heading for a sanctions. you need to start reading our polices and not relying on just the "strength" of your oratory.Slatersteven (talk) 16:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

At this point I feel wp:tenditious needs to be read by you. If you try to WP:BLUDGEON forums it will earn sanctions.Slatersteven (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

No I am not trying that! TubeYouTokTik (talk) 14:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

This is now a warning, if you post one more "source" does not support what you want to say or post one more source that is not an RS I will report you. I have asked you to read our polices, and it is clear you have not done so. My last comment, here, is this read wp:nothere.Slatersteven (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Slatersteven (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Administrator note

Any further disruption will result in removal of your editing privileges. Acroterion (talk) 16:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry, I am now leaving the disscuss TubeYouTokTik (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC) happy??