Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Abdullah Alam (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello! Tubod Founding Hero AGUSTIN GANOT MENDEZ, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Abdullah Alam (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Abdullah Alam (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 16)

edit

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tubod Founding Hero AGUSTIN GANOT MENDEZ/sandbox

edit
 

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Tubod Founding Hero AGUSTIN GANOT MENDEZ/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 333-blue 11:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 08:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agustin Ganot Mendez (September 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Agustin Ganot Mendez, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please stop submitting poorly formed drafts. Please either request help with the English or edit in a language in which you are proficient. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agustin Ganot Mendez (September 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Abdullah Alam (talk) 04:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Agustin Ganot Mendez

edit

  Draft:Agustin Ganot Mendez, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Agustin Ganot Mendez and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Agustin Ganot Mendez during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 01:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply