Tuduser

Welcome!

Hello, Tuduser, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Megaproject paradox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jminthorne (talk) 04:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Megaproject paradox

The article Megaproject paradox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is unlikely to be established as notable per WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jminthorne (talk) 04:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding Megaproject to See Also

I think you're misunderstanding the purpose of "See Also". Please see See Also. I feel like you're adding the link just to increase the number of links to Megaproject. Only a very small number of See Alsos should be added to an article, and only when it is abundantly clear why they are related. Please explain why you are adding this same link to so many articles. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. I will revert some, where the link and article is unrelated. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 01:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

In fact, I would be willing to go so far as to say that unless you have a reliable source describing these as Megaprojects, or it is absolutely obvious to any observer without specialized knowledge that the item in question is a "Megaproject," that the See Also shouldn't be there. I'd prefer for you (Tuduser) to do the reverts yourself, or attempt to justify the addition here. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:41, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

Your editing is being discussed here --Ronz (talk) 00:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)