Turquoiseeyes
|
Edit warring
editI've noticed that you seem to be involved in an edit war at Turkey. Please note that this persistent edit warring is considered disruptive and can lead to a block from editing. If you disagree with another editor, please talk the matter out with them, or if you cannot come to agreement, seek dispute resolution. Thanks! Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Amazons
editUnfortunately, the material which you insist on trying to add to the "Amazons" article contains complete nonsense, such as references to them as "Blonde" (what evidence is there for this?), and the incorrect spelling "Troyans" etc. etc. Please discuss this material on the discussion page Talk:Amazons before trying to add it to the article. AnonMoos 16:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Turquoiseeyes reply: Are you calling National Geographic's research "nonsense"? Should the people believe your ridicolous claims. Get a life and don't try to write the history on table, the history was lived and was recorded by many resources, not only yours, so accept the truth and scientific researches and be gentle to the people who has knowledge.
Amazons (bis)
editTake it to the talk page Talk:Amazons, and we'll discuss it there, but your additions to the page are not usable right now in their current form. For one thing, you don't even mention what issue of National Geographic this alleged research was published in, and in any case it's far from clear that this would overturn traditional scholarship based on ancient literary texts. Also, there's no reliable evidence for significant numbers of "Altaic" speakers west of Lake Balkhash until the 1st. century B.C., and no reliable evidence for significant numbers of Turkic speakers west of Lake Balkhash until the 6th century A.D., both of which are far too late to be relevant to ancient Amazons. Ca. 500 B.C., Iranian peoples such as Scyths, Sakas, Sogdians, and Sarmatians inhabited Central Asia and Southern Russia. P.S. You really need to learn to spell the word meaning "inhabitants of Troy" according to English-language usage. 02:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
editDue to your continued edit warring and incivility despite being warned, you have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. I would encourage you to review the no personal attacks, civility and edit warring policies during this time. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Blocked for continued edit warring
editTake a week off this time. Edit warring and falsely referring to the edits of others as vandalism is not acceptable. Please civilly discuss the issue before making any more reverts whatsoever, and seek dispute resolution if you cannot come to agreement. Further edit warring will lead to a longer or indefinite block. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Turkish people
editI reverted to your version since it seems more reliable, can I ask what the dispute is exactly about are you claiming Turks have Central Asian origin and the other user is saying something else? just to get a better idea of the dispute. --Vonones 20:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Image lacking copyright information
editImage copyright problem with Image:Ataturkler.jpg
editThank you for uploading Image:Ataturkler.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Blocked indefinitely
editUnfortunately, as it seems the point has not gotten through, I have had to extend your block to indefinite. Wikipedia is not for use as a battleground for any ideology or philosophy, and edit warring is not acceptable, period—especially when one's attempts at discussion amount to calling people "retards" [1], telling others to "get a life and accept the truth" and referring to them as "Turk haters" [2], and repeatedly referring to edits as "vandalism" while making racial references [3]. You've had plenty of chances to amend your behavior by this point, unfortunately I must conclude that you do not intend to do so at all. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
IT LOOKS LIKE WIKIPEDIA IS A BATTLEGROUND FOR YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE DELETING EVERYTHING WHAT YOU DON'T LIKE, IT'S AGAIN WIKIPEDIA POLICY. VERYTHING WRITTEN BY TURQUOISEEYES HAS REFERENCES! UNFORTUNATELY ANTI-TURKS LIKE YOU DOESN'T WANNA HEAR THE TRUTH BUT NOBODY VAN CHANGE THE TRUTH, ESPECIALLY YOU IDIOT!