Turtleshell3

Your GA nomination of Wojtek (bear)

The article Wojtek (bear) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wojtek (bear) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Example -- Example (talk) 01:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Anal scale. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 03:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

oh ok :( Turtleshell3 (talk) 03:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your talkpage conduct has in general been less than helpful. Talkpages are for substantial suggestions for article improvement, not for random interjections or commentary. Acroterion (talk) 03:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

What about on QAnon? Just trying to see how I can improve its "tone" Turtleshell3 (talk) 03:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

That wasn't specifically what I was referring to, but it's not exactly useful either - what do you think needs to be done? And by the way, don't lecture experienced users on the sourcing policy, please. Acroterion (talk) 04:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Well, the article is very "hard-hitting" but I would like to hear from the community about needs to be done on the neutrality of the article. In my opinion, I think what I said applies. The source they provided had nothing to do with Falun Gong or the Epoch Times. Turtleshell3 (talk) 04:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Mostly what I'm seeing on the talk page is heavily leaning to the size of the article, or referring to reorganize and make the article more clear. Turtleshell3 (talk) 04:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)