User talk:Tw3ak1t/Mohammad Nashir

Hi there, I'm just wondering if you think my page is OK to go ahead bwilkins, I have edited it as you requested.

Thanks.

Tw3ak1t (talk) 12:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

See WP:CITE ... especially the portion on inline citations. Are you 100% certain he met the conditions of notability I provided? I followed a couple of the links you have, and it does not appear to me that he's meeting them (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Dear Bwilkins, once again thank you for your patience, I have added more sources to support the article, if they are not enough - I will find more, thank you for your kind reviewing.

Tw3ak1t (talk) 12:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Every statement needs the reference beside it, and not at the bottom. Like I suggested, please read the section on inline references at WP:CITE (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Dear Bwilkins, I have cited the material beside the statements, they are numbered as citations according to the Wikipedia guidelines, please let me know if there is anything further.

Tw3ak1t (talk) 14:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Dear Bwilkins, could you update me - if my page is okay?

Tw3ak1t (talk) 22:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

It's nowhere close...there's nothing that shows this person as notable, and the WP:CITE are in the wrong places, and cannot prove any form of WP:GNG. Go back to WP:FIRSTARTICLE. Look at our manual of style. He is not a teacher that meets our requirements. He is not an author that meets our requirements. He founded a non-notable organization. You have not been able to show VALID 3rd party sources that say otherwise, just more blogs. I'm not sure how much more I can help if you're not going to read the policies I give to you (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Dear Bwilkins, if you read the article on notability on Academics on Wikipedia, it says

1. Impact on scholarly discipline - Mohammad's published books in the areas of academic subjects.
2. The person meets the elected member of a scholary organisation or society - Read source of Afghanistan Society - The University of Sheffield.
3. The person is in a field of literature - See Mohammad's poetry published in addition his creative music through the sources on the page
4. The person has made an impact on higher education - Mohammad lectured in Language Festival 2011 Sheffield University, he also lectured for Amnesty International for the Afghanistan Society and he also lectured to the entire year sevens in Birley Community College.

This is more than enough evidence pointing out that Mohammad is an academic and he has met your notability guidelines, please inform me now that he has met your academia guidelines what I should do next. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tw3ak1t (talk • contribs) 09:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Tw3ak1t (talk) 09:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

In addition if you read 'citing sources' in wikipedia's page under the title heading 'Preventing and repairing dead links' it says that "blogs should not be dead links", this is an example of how blogs can be permitted on wikipedia.

In addition in the rules, for citing sources there is nothing about blogs being the wrong source for a page, I think my page has nothing wrong with it and if there was something wrong it, I fixed it just now according to its notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tw3ak1t (talk • contribs) 09:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm out of this. I have pointed you to WP:RS, which is clear that blogs are not permissible. You are not accepting the help that is being provided whatsoever. I will continue to watch the draft. I recommend you move this towards WP:AFC if you're not going to listen to my advice (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

That link (AFC) states to create an article, does that mean I can submit my article appropriately for submission now and see whether it meets the sources suggested? I also noticed that blogs were permissable according to (RS) but I had to have it from a relevant writer or source, I would say they are coming from a third party point of view and really appreciate the poetry so they would be the right sources.

Thanks

Please if you don't mind could you answer my question.

Tw3ak1t (talk) 10:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)