Concerning recent edits

edit

Hi. I've felt it necessary to undo your recent edits to Skeptical Inquirer and a couple of other articles, because they violate some basic Wikipedia principles, including the principle that material should be weighted appropriately for the article it goes into, and the principle that material should be based on reputable sources, as explained at WP:RS. I think it might be good if you could discuss the changes you want to make on talk pages before making edits such as those. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Shut up moron. Wikipedia will be closed down because it is run by dumb Nazis like you.

November 2012

edit

The same suggestion as above applies: you've erased a good deal of important content in order to create undue weight in an article. Please read Wikipedia guidelines below if you intend to contribute. Please use the article talk page to discuss changes. Thank you. JNW (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Shut up moron. Wikipedia will be closed down because it is run by dumb Nazis like you.

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Two Wrongs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JNW (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply


Reply: I did not erase anything. Just the same thing you erased. What exactly are your qualifications.

This edit was essentially vandalism [1], as were several subsequent edits in which you removed content and images without consensus. It would have been appropriate to issue several formal warnings re: your deletion of content. I chose to opt for discussion--so much for diplomacy. And you don't want to go down the 'qualifications' road, either. It's an inappropriate line of questioning, and not a winning one, either. JNW (talk) 23:35, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: edit warring, etc

edit

I've reverted your edits again, for numerous reasons; WP:UNDUE, and the uncertainty that the source you're using is reliable, per WP:RELIABLE. The artist may merit mention within the section, but clearly not with the prominence you're pushing. If you continue in this vein, though, I'll request administrative assistance--your intentions are not non-neutral. JNW (talk) 21:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JNW (talk) 23:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, please remember to sign. Hertz1888 (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aristotle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 01:18, 23 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CAPTCHA. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Shut up.
 

The file File:Oh ye, all ye that walk in Willowood, by Margaret MacDonald, 1902.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply