Twsx

Archives

Archive 1 (2006-08 – 2007-06)
Archive 2 (2007-07 – 2008-03)
Archive 3 (2008-04 – 2013-12)
Archive 4 (2014-01 – 2019-11)
Archive 5 (2019-12 – *)

Last time archived: February 1st 2020

twsX	talk!	eMail me	contribs	subpages	sandbox

This is Twsx's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Twsx.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks
Did I make a mistake? Did I revert something that shouldn't have been reverted? Did I mess up otherwise? Nobody is perfect. As a matter of fact, I am at the furthest end of being perfect. Please, tell me if I did something wrong! Click on the picture to the left to add a new post!

Olan Montgomery One of your editors, Diannaa, recently removed content from my recently deceased brother's wiki. She cited copyright material from my brother's own website. No one should remove content without first talking with the author of that content. Unless the page is restored to it's original content before Diannaa arbitrarily destroyed it, there is no need to include my brother on this platform - Mike Montgomery Hello @Gumaraid:. I am not involved in this content dispute, I merely came along during and noticed a massive and unexplained removal of content, so I reverted it. I can see that you've already engaged with the other editor on their talk page, so I'll leave the two of you to resolving the matter. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 13:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Deletion review for Olan Montgomery An editor has asked for a deletion review of Olan Montgomery. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Gumaraid (talk) 14:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Good faith revision Hey, I'm just curious because I am new to Wikipedia. You reversed my contribution based on good faith, just wondering why, and what I can do to make it better as I am new to the process? Barrickinc (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC) Hello @Barrickinc: I have reverted your addition because it appears that the person you added to the article is not notable. People mentioned as notable within such an article should meet Wikipedia's guidelines on notability, and ideally, have their own article. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 17:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC) Hello Hello @Twsx! I would like to know how do you add these weird status that says like this user fights vandalism and a photo beside it. I will be very glad to know how Thanks, Wikipidean's Creed (talk) 08:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC) @Wikipidean's Creed: See WP:UBX. Anarchyte (talk • work) 08:36, 19 October 2020 (UTC) Oscar Wilde Hello! For some reason, I just saw a message from you that was sent on 25th November 2020 regarding changes to Oscar Wilde page. Yes, I use Wikipedia multiple times per day and read about all sorts of stuff, but rarely get an itch to actually change something. When I do, it's usually about sports related topics, like grammar mistakes or outdated facts (like player's tennis ranking that hasn't been updated in while). Preview is something I use every time, so I'm sure not to make a mess on a page. That said, I don't recall wisiting Oscar Wilde page or even making some changes. If I really did, I apologize. It's like I have a mild case of OCD, so sometimes I see things that seem to be in need of fixing and I can't help myself. For example, yesterday I tried to make a change at the page of former Russian boxer Evgeny Gradovich. His boxing record chart looked too narrow, because it collides with his personal data listed below his photo. I tried to move it a bit lower. That way everything would look better, and data would be clearer and easier to check. After trying for a few minutes, I realized I can't do it, so I let it be as it was. Maybe you can check it and give it a go. ~ 14:50, 17 February 2021. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.201.185.112 (talk) 13:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Hello @89.201.185.112: / @89.201.185.141:. You can find the edit in question here. Some maintenance tags were removed / messed up – altogether looked like an accidental edit to me. As such, I had reverted it and left that message on your talk page. No harm done! PS: Have you considered creating an account on Wikipedia? There are certain benefits to being logged in, in particular when it comes to communication with other editors. See this page in case you're interested. Cheers! ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 16:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC) Invitation to participate in a research Hello, The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey. You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement . Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. Kind Regards, WMF Research Team BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research Hello, I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement. Take the survey here. Kind Regards, WMF Research Team BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)